<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.feministsf.net/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=159.145.15.101</id>
	<title>Feminist SF Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.feministsf.net/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=159.145.15.101"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/159.145.15.101"/>
	<updated>2026-04-15T02:29:09Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Talk:Encyclopedia_of_female_characters&amp;diff=26784</id>
		<title>Talk:Encyclopedia of female characters</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Talk:Encyclopedia_of_female_characters&amp;diff=26784"/>
		<updated>2007-09-27T08:21:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;159.145.15.101: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;ousitpasc&lt;br /&gt;
This is a bit of an experiment. If it works, then I propose doing something similar for women writers.  It would be a template that we would append to women writers that would automatically give them an infobox and link to a &amp;quot;Directory of women writer&amp;quot;.  So more clear that the category system is being used in different ways to create different sets of resources, and help avoid problems / issues of ghettoization or the question of what does ghettoization mean when we have an encyclopedia where the default is &amp;quot;woman&amp;quot;. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 13:08, 20 April 2007 (PDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does this mean we should get rid of the Notable female characters Category, and other similar things? --[[User:Glory|Glory]] 11:02, 26 April 2007 (PDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think we should get rid of Category:Notable female characters and make a [[List of notable female characters]] instead. That way the list can include the name and a short explanation of &#039;&#039;why&#039;&#039; they&#039;re notable.  &amp;quot;First this&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Most famous example of this&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;influential in establishing a new genre&amp;quot;, etc. ... And then we can get rid of all the other &amp;quot;characters by gender&amp;quot; categories. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 05:40, 27 April 2007 (PDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>159.145.15.101</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>