https://wiki.feministsf.net/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=208.118.122.136Feminist SF Wiki - User contributions [en]2026-04-15T02:27:49ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.41.0https://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Talk:Vagina_dentata&diff=31760Talk:Vagina dentata2009-01-21T10:19:56Z<p>208.118.122.136: /* dgcst */ new section</p>
<hr />
<div>I haven't read ''Snow Crash'', but surely [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina_dentata vagina dentata] aren't anywhere ''near'' being '''new''' inventions, much less new ''technologies''. They've been part of mythical, misogynist biologies for centuries. --[[User:Ide Cyan|Ide Cyan]] 16:18, 21 February 2007 (PST)<br />
<br />
: i don't think i said it was new, did i? i meant to say "fictional". it's a theme from the past, and showed up as a technology in snow crash, and then a couple of years ago a woman in south africa invented one. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 20:25, 21 February 2007 (PST)<br />
<br />
It's the one-line "as portrayed in (a book published in the 1990s)" description that made it sound as if it hadn't existed before. And also the classification under "invention", then "technology", when it's been around as a myth for much longer than that. --[[User:Ide Cyan|Ide Cyan]] 20:28, 21 February 2007 (PST)<br />
<br />
: Yes, well, I got rid of invention and made it to technology. Glad you filled it out. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 20:39, 21 February 2007 (PST)<br />
<br />
== dgcst ==<br />
<br />
thery nice</div>208.118.122.136