GNU Free Documentation License - Revision history

Ide Cyan: removed non-FSF internal links to reduce number of unnecessary "Wanted" pages --- whew!

2007-02-10T18:33:22Z

removed non-FSF internal links to reduce number of unnecessary "Wanted" pages --- whew!

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:33, 10 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{redirect\|~~GFDL}}		The '''GNU Free Documentation License''' ('''GNU FDL''' or simply '''GFDL''') is a [[copyleft]] license for free content, designed by the Free Software Foundation (FSF) for the [[GNU]] project. It is the counterpart to the [[GNU GPL]] that gives readers the same rights to copy, redistribute and modify a work and requires all copies and derivatives to be available under the same license. Copies can also be sold commercially, but if produced in larger quantities (greater than 100) then the original document or source code must be made available to the work's recipient.
	[[~~Image:Heckert~~ GNU ~~white~~.~~svg\|thumb\|200px\|right\|GNU logo (similar in appearance~~ to a [[~~Wildebeest\|gnu~~]])]]

	The ~~'''GNU Free Documentation License''' ('''GNU FDL''' or simply '''GFDL''') is a [[copyleft]] [[~~license]] for ~~[[free content]]~~, ~~designed by the [[Free Software Foundation]] (FSF)~~ for ~~the [[GNU]] project~~. ~~It is the counterpart to the~~ [[~~GNU GPL~~]] ~~that gives readers the same rights to copy~~, ~~redistribute and modify a work and requires all copies and derivatives to be available under~~ the ~~same license. Copies can also be sold commercially, but if produced in larger quantities (greater than 100) then the original document or source code must be made available to the work's recipient~~.		The license was designed for manuals, textbooks, other reference and instructional materials, and documentation which often accompanies GPL software. However, it can be used for any text-based work, regardless of subject matter. Projects under GFDL include [[Wikipedia]], which is the largest documentation project among them.

	The license was designed for [[manual]]s, textbooks, other reference and instructional materials, and documentation which often accompanies GPL software. However, it can be used for any text-based work, regardless of subject matter. Projects under GFDL include [[Wikipedia]], which is the largest documentation project among them.

	~~{{listen\|filename=GFDL (English).ogg\|title=Listen to the GFDL\|description=Audio recording of the full text of the GNU Free Documentation License.\|format=[[Ogg]]}}~~

	== Secondary Sections ==		== Secondary Sections ==
Line 14:		Line 10:

	== Commercial redistribution ==		== Commercial redistribution ==
	The GFDL requires the ability to "copy and distribute the Document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially" and therefore is incompatible with material that excludes commercial re-use. Material that restricts commercial re-use is incompatible with the license and cannot be incorporated into the work. However, incorporating such restricted material may be [[fair use]] and does not need to be licensed to fall within the GFDL if such fair use is covered by all potential subsequent uses. One good example of such liberal and commercial fair use is [[parody]].		The GFDL requires the ability to "copy and distribute the Document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially" and therefore is incompatible with material that excludes commercial re-use. Material that restricts commercial re-use is incompatible with the license and cannot be incorporated into the work. However, incorporating such restricted material may be [[fair use]] and does not need to be licensed to fall within the GFDL if such fair use is covered by all potential subsequent uses. One good example of such liberal and commercial fair use is parody.

	== Criticisms of the GFDL ==		== Criticisms of the GFDL ==
	Many people and groups consider the GFDL a non-free license. The reasons for this are that the GFDL allows "invariant" text which cannot be modified or removed, and that its prohibition against [[digital rights management]] (DRM) systems affects valid usages as well. Some members of the [[Debian]] project (based on their [[Debian Free Software Guidelines]]) agree. The project eventually voted [http://www.us.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001] to consider works licensed under the GFDL to be free provided the invariant section clauses are not used.		Many people and groups consider the GFDL a non-free license. The reasons for this are that the GFDL allows "invariant" text which cannot be modified or removed, and that its prohibition against digital rights management (DRM) systems affects valid usages as well. Some members of the Debian project (based on their Debian Free Software Guidelines) agree. The project eventually voted [http://www.us.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001] to consider works licensed under the GFDL to be free provided the invariant section clauses are not used.

	A number of objections have been made to the GNU FDL, with some critics recommending the use of alternate licenses (such as the [[share-alike]] [[Creative Commons License~~\|Creative Commons licenses~~]]) or even the GNU GPL. The Debian project has a [http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml detailed draft of objections]		A number of objections have been made to the GNU FDL, with some critics recommending the use of alternate licenses (such as the share-alike [[Creative Commons License]]s) or even the GNU GPL. The Debian project has a [http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml detailed draft of objections]
	and [[Nathanael Nerode]] has also [http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html] summarized his objections. Often mentioned arguments against the GFDL include:		and Nathanael Nerode has also [http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html] summarized his objections. Often mentioned arguments against the GFDL include:

	=== Overly broad DRM clause ===		=== Overly broad DRM clause ===
Line 29:		Line 25:
	A criticism of this language is that it is too broad, because it applies to private copies made but not distributed. This means that a licensee is not allowed to save document copies "made" in a proprietary file format or using encryption.		A criticism of this language is that it is too broad, because it applies to private copies made but not distributed. This means that a licensee is not allowed to save document copies "made" in a proprietary file format or using encryption.

	In [[2003]], [[Richard Stallman]] [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/09/msg00212.html said] about the above sentence on the [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal debian-legal] mailinglist:		In 2003, Richard Stallman [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/09/msg00212.html said] about the above sentence on the [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal debian-legal] mailinglist:

	<blockquote>"This means that you cannot publish them under DRM systems to restrict the possessors of the copies. It isn't supposed to refer to use of encryption or file access control on your own copy. I will talk with our lawyer and see if that sentence needs to be clarified."</blockquote>		<blockquote>"This means that you cannot publish them under DRM systems to restrict the possessors of the copies. It isn't supposed to refer to use of encryption or file access control on your own copy. I will talk with our lawyer and see if that sentence needs to be clarified."</blockquote>

	[[As of 2006]], the sentence has not yet been clarified.		As of 2006, the sentence has not yet been clarified.

	=== Invariant sections ===		=== Invariant sections ===
	A GNU FDL work can quickly be encumbered because a new, different, title must be given and a list of previous titles must be kept. This could lead to the situation where there are a whole series of title pages, and dedications, in each and every copy of the book if it has a long lineage. These pages cannot ''ever'' be removed, at least not until the work enters the [[public domain]] after [[copyright]] expires.		A GNU FDL work can quickly be encumbered because a new, different, title must be given and a list of previous titles must be kept. This could lead to the situation where there are a whole series of title pages, and dedications, in each and every copy of the book if it has a long lineage. These pages cannot ''ever'' be removed, at least not until the work enters the [[public domain]] after [[copyright]] expires.

	[[Richard Stallman]] [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/08/msg00807.html said] about invariant sections on the [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal debian-legal] mailinglist:		Richard Stallman [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/08/msg00807.html said] about invariant sections on the [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal debian-legal] mailinglist:

	<blockquote>"The goal of invariant sections, ever since the 80s when we first made the GNU Manifesto an invariant section in the Emacs Manual, was to make sure they could not be removed. Specifically, to make sure that distributors of Emacs that also distribute non-free software could not remove the statements of our philosophy, which they might think of doing because those statements criticize their actions."</blockquote>		<blockquote>"The goal of invariant sections, ever since the 80s when we first made the GNU Manifesto an invariant section in the Emacs Manual, was to make sure they could not be removed. Specifically, to make sure that distributors of Emacs that also distribute non-free software could not remove the statements of our philosophy, which they might think of doing because those statements criticize their actions."</blockquote>

	Ironically, this problem is reminiscent of ~~[[BSD license#The UC Berkeley advertising clause\|~~GNU's problem with the 4 clause BSD license]].		Ironically, this problem is reminiscent of GNU's problem with the 4 clause BSD license.

	=== GPL incompatible in both directions ===		=== GPL incompatible in both directions ===
	The GNU FDL is incompatible in both directions with the GPL: that is GNU FDL material cannot be put into GPL code and GPL code cannot be put into a GNU FDL manual. Because of this, code samples are often ~~[[dual license\|~~dual-licensed]] so that they may appear in documentation and can be incorporated into a free software program.		The GNU FDL is incompatible in both directions with the GPL: that is GNU FDL material cannot be put into GPL code and GPL code cannot be put into a GNU FDL manual. Because of this, code samples are often dual-licensed so that they may appear in documentation and can be incorporated into a free software program.

	=== Burdens when printing ===		=== Burdens when printing ===
Line 58:		Line 54:

	=== Transparent formats ===		=== Transparent formats ===
	The definition of a "transparent" format is complicated, and may be difficult to apply. For example, drawings are required to be in a format that allows them to be revised straightforwardly with "some widely available drawing editor." The definition of "widely available" may be difficult to interpret, and may change over time, since, e.g., the open-source [[Inkscape]] editor is rapidly maturing, but is still in a prerelease stage. This section, which was rewritten somewhat between versions 1.1 and 1.2 of the license, uses the terms "widely available" and "proprietary" inconsistently and without defining them. According to a strict interpretation of the license, the references to "generic text editors" could be interpreted as ruling out a format used by an open-source word-processor such as [[Abiword]]; according to a loose interpretation, however, [[Microsoft ~~Office~~ Word~~\|Microsoft Word]]~~ .doc format could qualify as transparent, since a subset of .doc files can be edited perfectly using [[OpenOffice.org]], and the format therefore is not one "that can be read and edited only by proprietary word processors."		The definition of a "transparent" format is complicated, and may be difficult to apply. For example, drawings are required to be in a format that allows them to be revised straightforwardly with "some widely available drawing editor." The definition of "widely available" may be difficult to interpret, and may change over time, since, e.g., the open-source Inkscape editor is rapidly maturing, but is still in a prerelease stage. This section, which was rewritten somewhat between versions 1.1 and 1.2 of the license, uses the terms "widely available" and "proprietary" inconsistently and without defining them. According to a strict interpretation of the license, the references to "generic text editors" could be interpreted as ruling out a format used by an open-source word-processor such as Abiword; according to a loose interpretation, however, Microsoft Word .doc format could qualify as transparent, since a subset of .doc files can be edited perfectly using OpenOffice.org, and the format therefore is not one "that can be read and edited only by proprietary word processors."

	== History ==		== History ==
	The FDL was released in draft form for feedback in late [[1999]]. After revisions, version 1.1 was issued in [[March 2000]], and version 1.2 in [[November 2002]]. The current state of the license is version 1.2.		The FDL was released in draft form for feedback in late 1999. After revisions, version 1.1 was issued in March 2000, and version 1.2 in November 2002. The current state of the license is version 1.2.

	== Other free content licenses ==		== Other free content licenses ==
	Some of these were developed independently of the GNU FDL, while others were developed in response to perceived flaws in the GNU FDL.		Some of these were developed independently of the GNU FDL, while others were developed in response to perceived flaws in the GNU FDL.
	* The [[Creative Commons]] "CC-by-sa" and "CC-nc-sa" licenses		* The Creative Commons "CC-by-sa" and "CC-nc-sa" licenses
	* [[Design Science License]]		* Design Science License
	* [[Open Content License]]		* Open Content License
	* [[Open Publication License]]		* Open Publication License

	~~== See also ==~~
	* [[BSD license]]
	* [[Copyright]]
	* [[Copyleft]]
	* [[Free software license]]
	* [[GNU]]
	* [[Open content]]
	* [[Open source hardware]]
	* [[Share-alike]]
	* [[Software licensing]] <!-- should the above "alternatives" list be moved to [[software licensing]] ? -->

	== External links ==		== External links ==

Ide Cyan: /* External links */ removed language links that lead to nowhere here

2007-02-10T18:20:02Z

External links: removed language links that lead to nowhere here

@@ Line 82: / Line 82: @@
 == External links ==
-{{wikisource}}
+* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Free_Documentation_License GNU Free Documentation License page at Wikipedia]
 * [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GFDL official text]
 * [http://www.fsf.org/licenses/fdl.html The GNU Free Documentation License]
@@ Line 94: / Line 94: @@
 [[Category:Free content licenses]]
 [[Category:Technical communication]]

Leeanne at 06:04, 25 April 2006

2006-04-25T06:04:45Z

New page

{{redirect|GFDL}}
[[Image:Heckert GNU white.svg|thumb|200px|right|GNU logo (similar in appearance to a [[Wildebeest|gnu]])]]

The '''GNU Free Documentation License''' ('''GNU FDL''' or simply '''GFDL''') is a [[copyleft]] [[license]] for [[free content]], designed by the [[Free Software Foundation]] (FSF) for the [[GNU]] project. It is the counterpart to the [[GNU GPL]] that gives readers the same rights to copy, redistribute and modify a work and requires all copies and derivatives to be available under the same license. Copies can also be sold commercially, but if produced in larger quantities (greater than 100) then the original document or source code must be made available to the work's recipient.

The license was designed for [[manual]]s, textbooks, other reference and instructional materials, and documentation which often accompanies GPL software. However, it can be used for any text-based work, regardless of subject matter. Projects under GFDL include [[Wikipedia]], which is the largest documentation project among them.

{{listen|filename=GFDL (English).ogg|title=Listen to the GFDL|description=Audio recording of the full text of the GNU Free Documentation License.|format=[[Ogg]]}}

== Secondary Sections ==
The license explicitly separates any kind of "Document" from "Secondary Sections", which may not be integrated with the Document, but exist as front-matter materials or appendices. Secondary sections can contain information regarding the author's or publisher's relationship to the subject matter, but not any subject matter itself. While the Document itself is wholly editable, and is essentially covered by a license equivalent to (but both-ways incompatible with) the [[GNU General Public License]], some of the secondary sections have various restrictions designed primarily to deal with proper attribution to previous authors.

Specifically, the authors of prior versions have to be acknowledged and certain "invariant sections" specified by the original author and dealing with his or her relationship to the subject matter may not be changed. If the material is modified, its title has to be changed (unless the prior authors give permission to retain the title). The license also has provisions for the handling of front-cover and back-cover texts of books, as well as for "History", "Acknowledgements", "Dedications" and "Endorsements" sections.

== Commercial redistribution ==
The GFDL requires the ability to "copy and distribute the Document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially" and therefore is incompatible with material that excludes commercial re-use. Material that restricts commercial re-use is incompatible with the license and cannot be incorporated into the work. However, incorporating such restricted material may be [[fair use]] and does not need to be licensed to fall within the GFDL if such fair use is covered by all potential subsequent uses. One good example of such liberal and commercial fair use is [[parody]].

== Criticisms of the GFDL ==
Many people and groups consider the GFDL a non-free license. The reasons for this are that the GFDL allows "invariant" text which cannot be modified or removed, and that its prohibition against [[digital rights management]] (DRM) systems affects valid usages as well. Some members of the [[Debian]] project (based on their [[Debian Free Software Guidelines]]) agree. The project eventually voted [http://www.us.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001] to consider works licensed under the GFDL to be free provided the invariant section clauses are not used.

A number of objections have been made to the GNU FDL, with some critics recommending the use of alternate licenses (such as the [[share-alike]] [[Creative Commons License|Creative Commons licenses]]) or even the GNU GPL. The Debian project has a [http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml detailed draft of objections]
and [[Nathanael Nerode]] has also [http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html] summarized his objections. Often mentioned arguments against the GFDL include:

=== Overly broad DRM clause ===
The GNU FDL contains the statement:

<blockquote>"You may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading or further copying of the copies you make or distribute."</blockquote>

A criticism of this language is that it is too broad, because it applies to private copies made but not distributed. This means that a licensee is not allowed to save document copies "made" in a proprietary file format or using encryption.

In [[2003]], [[Richard Stallman]] [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/09/msg00212.html said] about the above sentence on the [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal debian-legal] mailinglist:

<blockquote>"This means that you cannot publish them under DRM systems to restrict the possessors of the copies. It isn't supposed to refer to use of encryption or file access control on your own copy. I will talk with our lawyer and see if that sentence needs to be clarified."</blockquote>

[[As of 2006]], the sentence has not yet been clarified.

=== Invariant sections ===
A GNU FDL work can quickly be encumbered because a new, different, title must be given and a list of previous titles must be kept. This could lead to the situation where there are a whole series of title pages, and dedications, in each and every copy of the book if it has a long lineage. These pages cannot ''ever'' be removed, at least not until the work enters the [[public domain]] after [[copyright]] expires.

[[Richard Stallman]] [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/08/msg00807.html said] about invariant sections on the [http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal debian-legal] mailinglist:

<blockquote>"The goal of invariant sections, ever since the 80s when we first made the GNU Manifesto an invariant section in the Emacs Manual, was to make sure they could not be removed. Specifically, to make sure that distributors of Emacs that also distribute non-free software could not remove the statements of our philosophy, which they might think of doing because those statements criticize their actions."</blockquote>

Ironically, this problem is reminiscent of [[BSD license#The UC Berkeley advertising clause|GNU's problem with the 4 clause BSD license]].

=== GPL incompatible in both directions ===
The GNU FDL is incompatible in both directions with the GPL: that is GNU FDL material cannot be put into GPL code and GPL code cannot be put into a GNU FDL manual. Because of this, code samples are often [[dual license|dual-licensed]] so that they may appear in documentation and can be incorporated into a free software program.

=== Burdens when printing ===
The GNU FDL requires that licensees, when printing a document covered by the license, must also include "this License, the copyright notices, and the license notice saying this License applies
to the Document are reproduced in all copies". This means that if a licensee prints out a copy of an article whose text is covered under the GNU FDL, he or she must also include a copyright notice and a physical printout of the GNU FDL, which is a significantly large document in itself.

=== Ideological tone ===
The license has a preamble, which some critics dislike because of its ideological tone. Because the preamble is part of the license, it must be included (along with the rest of the license's text) with every copy of a licensed document.

=== Length ===
Some consider the license to be too long.

=== Transparent formats ===
The definition of a "transparent" format is complicated, and may be difficult to apply. For example, drawings are required to be in a format that allows them to be revised straightforwardly with "some widely available drawing editor." The definition of "widely available" may be difficult to interpret, and may change over time, since, e.g., the open-source [[Inkscape]] editor is rapidly maturing, but is still in a prerelease stage. This section, which was rewritten somewhat between versions 1.1 and 1.2 of the license, uses the terms "widely available" and "proprietary" inconsistently and without defining them. According to a strict interpretation of the license, the references to "generic text editors" could be interpreted as ruling out a format used by an open-source word-processor such as [[Abiword]]; according to a loose interpretation, however, [[Microsoft Office Word|Microsoft Word]] .doc format could qualify as transparent, since a subset of .doc files can be edited perfectly using [[OpenOffice.org]], and the format therefore is not one "that can be read and edited only by proprietary word processors."

== History ==
The FDL was released in draft form for feedback in late [[1999]]. After revisions, version 1.1 was issued in [[March 2000]], and version 1.2 in [[November 2002]]. The current state of the license is version 1.2.

== Other free content licenses ==
Some of these were developed independently of the GNU FDL, while others were developed in response to perceived flaws in the GNU FDL.
* The [[Creative Commons]] "CC-by-sa" and "CC-nc-sa" licenses
* [[Design Science License]]
* [[Open Content License]]
* [[Open Publication License]]

== See also ==
* [[BSD license]]
* [[Copyright]]
* [[Copyleft]]
* [[Free software license]]
* [[GNU]]
* [[Open content]]
* [[Open source hardware]]
* [[Share-alike]]
* [[Software licensing]] 

== External links ==
{{wikisource}}
* [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GFDL official text]
* [http://www.fsf.org/licenses/fdl.html The GNU Free Documentation License]
* [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-doc.html Free Software and Free Manuals]
* [http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml Draft of Debian position statement about the GFDL]
* [http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html Why You Shouldn't Use the GNU FDL]
* [[wikitravel:Wikitravel:Why_Wikitravel_isn't_GFDL|Why Wikitravel isn't GFDL]]: Problems with using the GFDL for short printed texts
* [http://www.gnu.org/encyclopedia/ The Free Universal Encyclopedia And Learning Resource]

[[Category:GNU project]]
[[Category:Free content licenses]]
[[Category:Technical communication]]
[[Category:GFDL| ]]

[[af:GNU/FDL-lisensie]]
[[ar:رخصة الوثائق الحرة (جنو)]]
[[be:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[bg:Лиценз за свободна документация на ГНУ]]
[[zh-min-nan:GNU Chū-iû Bûn-kiāⁿ Hí-khó-su]]
[[ca:Llicència de documentació lliure de GNU]]
[[cs:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[cy:Wicipedia:GNU FDL]]
[[da:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[de:GNU-Lizenz für freie Dokumentation]]
[[el:Άδεια Ελεύθερης Τεκμηρίωσης GNU]]
[[et:GNU FDL]]
[[als:GNU-Lizenz für freie Dokumentation]]
[[es:Licencia de documentación libre GNU]]
[[eo:GFDL]]
[[eu:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[fa:GNU FDL]]
[[fo:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[fr:Licence de documentation libre GNU]]
[[fy:GNU/FDL]]
[[ga:GNU FDL]]
[[gl:Licenza de Documentación Libre GNU]]
[[gu:GFDL]]
[[he:GNU FDL]]
[[ko:GNU 자유 문서 사용 허가서]]
[[id:GFDL]]
[[ia:Licentia GNU pro Documentation Libere]]
[[is:Frjálsa GNU handbókarleyfið]]
[[it:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[ka:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[ku:Lîsansa Belgekirina Azada GNU]]
[[lt:GNU FDL]]
[[lb:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[li:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[lv:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[hu:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[ms:Lesen Dokumentasi Bebas GNU]]
[[nl:GNU Vrije Documentatie Licentie]]
[[nds-nl:GNU-FDL]]
[[nds:GNU-FDL]]
[[ja:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[no:GNU fri dokumentasjonslisens]]
[[nn:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[oc:Licéncia de documentacion liura GNU]]
[[pl:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[pt:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[ro:GNU FDL]]
[[ru:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[sc:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[simple:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[sl:Dovoljenje GNU za rabo proste dokumentacije]]
[[sr:ГНУ-ова ЛСД]]
[[su:Lisénsi Dokumén Bébas GNU]]
[[fi:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[sv:GFDL]]
[[tl:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[tt:GNU/İrekle İstälek Röxsätnämäse]]
[[th:GNU Free Documentation License]]
[[tr:GNU Özgür Belgeleme Lisansı]]
[[vi:Giấy phép Văn bản Tự do GNU]]
[[wa:Licince di documintåcion libe di GNU]]
[[zh:GNU自由文档许可证]]