Talk:Vagina dentata - Revision history

208.118.122.136: /* dgcst */ new section

2009-01-21T10:19:56Z

dgcst: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:19, 21 January 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	: Yes, well, I got rid of invention and made it to technology. Glad you filled it out. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 20:39, 21 February 2007 (PST)		: Yes, well, I got rid of invention and made it to technology. Glad you filled it out. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 20:39, 21 February 2007 (PST)

			== dgcst ==

			thery nice

Lquilter: resp

2007-02-22T04:39:49Z

resp

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:39, 21 February 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	It's the one-line "as portrayed in (a book published in the 1990s)" description that made it sound as if it hadn't existed before. And also the classification under "invention", then "technology", when it's been around as a myth for much longer than that. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 20:28, 21 February 2007 (PST)		It's the one-line "as portrayed in (a book published in the 1990s)" description that made it sound as if it hadn't existed before. And also the classification under "invention", then "technology", when it's been around as a myth for much longer than that. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 20:28, 21 February 2007 (PST)

			: Yes, well, I got rid of invention and made it to technology. Glad you filled it out. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 20:39, 21 February 2007 (PST)

Ide Cyan at 04:29, 22 February 2007

2007-02-22T04:29:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 21 February 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: i don't think i said it was new, did i? i meant to say "fictional". it's a theme from the past, and showed up as a technology in snow crash, and then a couple of years ago a woman in south africa invented one. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 20:25, 21 February 2007 (PST)		: i don't think i said it was new, did i? i meant to say "fictional". it's a theme from the past, and showed up as a technology in snow crash, and then a couple of years ago a woman in south africa invented one. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 20:25, 21 February 2007 (PST)

	It's the one-line "as portrayed in (a book published in the 1990s)" description that made it sound as if it hadn't existed before. And also the classification under "technology", when it's been around as a myth for much longer than that. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 20:28, 21 February 2007 (PST)		It's the one-line "as portrayed in (a book published in the 1990s)" description that made it sound as if it hadn't existed before. And also the classification under "invention", then "technology", when it's been around as a myth for much longer than that. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 20:28, 21 February 2007 (PST)

Ide Cyan at 04:28, 22 February 2007

2007-02-22T04:28:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 21 February 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: i don't think i said it was new, did i? i meant to say "fictional". it's a theme from the past, and showed up as a technology in snow crash, and then a couple of years ago a woman in south africa invented one. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 20:25, 21 February 2007 (PST)		: i don't think i said it was new, did i? i meant to say "fictional". it's a theme from the past, and showed up as a technology in snow crash, and then a couple of years ago a woman in south africa invented one. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 20:25, 21 February 2007 (PST)

	It's the one-line "as portrayed in (a book published in the 1990s)" description that made it sound as if it hadn't existed before. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 20:27, 21 February 2007 (PST)		It's the one-line "as portrayed in (a book published in the 1990s)" description that made it sound as if it hadn't existed before. And also the classification under "technology", when it's been around as a myth for much longer than that. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 20:28, 21 February 2007 (PST)

Ide Cyan at 04:27, 22 February 2007

2007-02-22T04:27:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:27, 21 February 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	: i don't think i said it was new, did i? i meant to say "fictional". it's a theme from the past, and showed up as a technology in snow crash, and then a couple of years ago a woman in south africa invented one. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 20:25, 21 February 2007 (PST)		: i don't think i said it was new, did i? i meant to say "fictional". it's a theme from the past, and showed up as a technology in snow crash, and then a couple of years ago a woman in south africa invented one. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 20:25, 21 February 2007 (PST)

			It's the one-line "as portrayed in (a book published in the 1990s)" description that made it sound as if it hadn't existed before. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 20:27, 21 February 2007 (PST)

Lquilter: sig

2007-02-22T04:25:35Z

sig

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 21 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I haven't read ''Snow Crash'', but surely [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina_dentata vagina dentata] aren't anywhere ''near'' being '''new''' inventions, much less new ''technologies''. They've been part of mythical, misogynist biologies for centuries. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 16:18, 21 February 2007 (PST)		I haven't read ''Snow Crash'', but surely [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina_dentata vagina dentata] aren't anywhere ''near'' being '''new''' inventions, much less new ''technologies''. They've been part of mythical, misogynist biologies for centuries. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 16:18, 21 February 2007 (PST)

	: i don't think i said it was new, did i? i meant to say "fictional". it's a theme from the past, and showed up as a technology in snow crash, and then a couple of years ago a woman in south africa invented one. --[[User:~~74.65.247.118~~\|~~74.65.247.118~~]] 20:24, 21 February 2007 (PST)		: i don't think i said it was new, did i? i meant to say "fictional". it's a theme from the past, and showed up as a technology in snow crash, and then a couple of years ago a woman in south africa invented one. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 20:25, 21 February 2007 (PST)

74.65.247.118: new => fictional

2007-02-22T04:24:41Z

new => fictional

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:24, 21 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I haven't read ''Snow Crash'', but surely [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina_dentata vagina dentata] aren't anywhere ''near'' being '''new''' inventions, much less new ''technologies''. They've been part of mythical, misogynist biologies for centuries. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 16:18, 21 February 2007 (PST)		I haven't read ''Snow Crash'', but surely [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina_dentata vagina dentata] aren't anywhere ''near'' being '''new''' inventions, much less new ''technologies''. They've been part of mythical, misogynist biologies for centuries. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 16:18, 21 February 2007 (PST)

			: i don't think i said it was new, did i? i meant to say "fictional". it's a theme from the past, and showed up as a technology in snow crash, and then a couple of years ago a woman in south africa invented one. --[[User:74.65.247.118\|74.65.247.118]] 20:24, 21 February 2007 (PST)

Ide Cyan: Technowuh?

2007-02-22T00:18:53Z

Technowuh?

New page

I haven't read ''Snow Crash'', but surely [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina_dentata vagina dentata] aren't anywhere ''near'' being '''new''' inventions, much less new ''technologies''. They've been part of mythical, misogynist biologies for centuries. --[[User:Ide Cyan|Ide Cyan]] 16:18, 21 February 2007 (PST)