Talk:WisCon 30 - Revision history

Ide Cyan: Undo revision 25927 by 203.69.39.250 (Talk) there's a plague of vandals these days

2007-07-15T00:54:52Z

Undo revision 25927 by 203.69.39.250 (Talk) there's a plague of vandals these days

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:54, 14 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is this intended to be a complete list of program items? If not, what's the organizing principle/basis for selection? [[User:Vicki\|Vicki]] 09:34, 12 June 2006 (PDT)		Is this intended to be a complete list of program items? If not, what's the organizing principle/basis for selection? [[User:Vicki\|Vicki]] 09:34, 12 June 2006 (PDT)

	:I started it as a place to link to con reports, ensuing discussion, or include notes on the wiki. Then I've just been adding some others as they come along, intending to perhaps inspire more posting of notes or discussions. I haven't gone thru		:I started it as a place to link to con reports, ensuing discussion, or include notes on the wiki. Then I've just been adding some others as they come along, intending to perhaps inspire more posting of notes or discussions. I haven't gone thru & added in everything yet, but if someone wanted to do that, it would be nifty. [[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 10:18, 12 June 2006 (PDT)

			:I added some of the panels I went to, but not all of them - in no particular pattern. It ended up being whatever I wasn't too exhausted to document. It might be nice to put in all the panel descriptions and participants, which are up on the Wiscon site somewhere, but buried a bit deep & are slow to load, I think.--[[User:Liz Henry\|Liz Henry]] 17:03, 12 June 2006 (PDT)


			----


			I'm interested in publishing some of the WisCon 30 panel transcripts & descriptions in a volume of the Conversation Pieces dedicated to WisCon 30. To publish a particular transcript, I'd need the cooperation as well as the permission of its author. (& I will also, of course, want to give people quoted the opportunity to verify that they made the statements attributed to them.) I know that Liz Henry produced the think-tank transcript. But is there a record, invisible to the casual reader, of who produced other of these transcripts?

			Timmi Duchamp

			You can click on "history" at the top of any page to see the edits, including who is credited for them. If someone didn't log in, all you will see as a credit/attribution is their IP address -- probably not a good idea to cite to that; "anonymous" would be preferred in those instances. You can see what the individual contributions were by clicking on the links to the left of each individual contribution. Ideally, a transcript would be put in by person X, and then filled in by persons Y, Z, A, and B, of whom Z and B were panelists. But that hasn't happened yet. So far, typically, a transcript is initially put in by person X, and then edited by zero to three other people for formatting, typos, links, commentary. [[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 20 June 2006

203.69.39.250 at 22:02, 14 July 2007

2007-07-14T22:02:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:02, 14 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is this intended to be a complete list of program items? If not, what's the organizing principle/basis for selection? [[User:Vicki\|Vicki]] 09:34, 12 June 2006 (PDT)		Is this intended to be a complete list of program items? If not, what's the organizing principle/basis for selection? [[User:Vicki\|Vicki]] 09:34, 12 June 2006 (PDT)

	:I started it as a place to link to con reports, ensuing discussion, or include notes on the wiki. Then I've just been adding some others as they come along, intending to perhaps inspire more posting of notes or discussions. I haven't gone thru ~~& added in everything yet, but if someone wanted to do that, it would be nifty. [[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 10:18, 12 June 2006 (PDT)~~		:I started it as a place to link to con reports, ensuing discussion, or include notes on the wiki. Then I've just been adding some others as they come along, intending to perhaps inspire more posting of notes or discussions. I haven't gone thru

	:I added some of the panels I went to, but not all of them - in no particular pattern. It ended up being whatever I wasn't too exhausted to document. It might be nice to put in all the panel descriptions and participants, which are up on the Wiscon site somewhere, but buried a bit deep & are slow to load, I think.--[[User:Liz Henry\|Liz Henry]] 17:03, 12 June 2006 (PDT)


	~~----~~


	I'm interested in publishing some of the WisCon 30 panel transcripts & descriptions in a volume of the Conversation Pieces dedicated to WisCon 30. To publish a particular transcript, I'd need the cooperation as well as the permission of its author. (& I will also, of course, want to give people quoted the opportunity to verify that they made the statements attributed to them.) I know that Liz Henry produced the think-tank transcript. But is there a record, invisible to the casual reader, of who produced other of these transcripts?

	~~Timmi Duchamp~~

	You can click on "history" at the top of any page to see the edits, including who is credited for them. If someone didn't log in, all you will see as a credit/attribution is their IP address -- probably not a good idea to cite to that; "anonymous" would be preferred in those instances. You can see what the individual contributions were by clicking on the links to the left of each individual contribution. Ideally, a transcript would be put in by person X, and then filled in by persons Y, Z, A, and B, of whom Z and B were panelists. But that hasn't happened yet. So far, typically, a transcript is initially put in by person X, and then edited by zero to three other people for formatting, typos, links, commentary. [[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 20 June 2006

128.122.73.84 at 21:46, 20 June 2006

2006-06-20T21:46:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:46, 20 June 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Timmi Duchamp		Timmi Duchamp

			You can click on "history" at the top of any page to see the edits, including who is credited for them. If someone didn't log in, all you will see as a credit/attribution is their IP address -- probably not a good idea to cite to that; "anonymous" would be preferred in those instances. You can see what the individual contributions were by clicking on the links to the left of each individual contribution. Ideally, a transcript would be put in by person X, and then filled in by persons Y, Z, A, and B, of whom Z and B were panelists. But that hasn't happened yet. So far, typically, a transcript is initially put in by person X, and then edited by zero to three other people for formatting, typos, links, commentary. [[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 20 June 2006

66.235.12.242 at 21:15, 20 June 2006

2006-06-20T21:15:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:15, 20 June 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:I added some of the panels I went to, but not all of them - in no particular pattern. It ended up being whatever I wasn't too exhausted to document. It might be nice to put in all the panel descriptions and participants, which are up on the Wiscon site somewhere, but buried a bit deep & are slow to load, I think.--[[User:Liz Henry\|Liz Henry]] 17:03, 12 June 2006 (PDT)		:I added some of the panels I went to, but not all of them - in no particular pattern. It ended up being whatever I wasn't too exhausted to document. It might be nice to put in all the panel descriptions and participants, which are up on the Wiscon site somewhere, but buried a bit deep & are slow to load, I think.--[[User:Liz Henry\|Liz Henry]] 17:03, 12 June 2006 (PDT)


			----


			I'm interested in publishing some of the WisCon 30 panel transcripts & descriptions in a volume of the Conversation Pieces dedicated to WisCon 30. To publish a particular transcript, I'd need the cooperation as well as the permission of its author. (& I will also, of course, want to give people quoted the opportunity to verify that they made the statements attributed to them.) I know that Liz Henry produced the think-tank transcript. But is there a record, invisible to the casual reader, of who produced other of these transcripts?

			Timmi Duchamp

Liz Henry at 00:03, 13 June 2006

2006-06-13T00:03:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:03, 12 June 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:I started it as a place to link to con reports, ensuing discussion, or include notes on the wiki. Then I've just been adding some others as they come along, intending to perhaps inspire more posting of notes or discussions. I haven't gone thru & added in everything yet, but if someone wanted to do that, it would be nifty. [[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 10:18, 12 June 2006 (PDT)		:I started it as a place to link to con reports, ensuing discussion, or include notes on the wiki. Then I've just been adding some others as they come along, intending to perhaps inspire more posting of notes or discussions. I haven't gone thru & added in everything yet, but if someone wanted to do that, it would be nifty. [[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 10:18, 12 June 2006 (PDT)

			:I added some of the panels I went to, but not all of them - in no particular pattern. It ended up being whatever I wasn't too exhausted to document. It might be nice to put in all the panel descriptions and participants, which are up on the Wiscon site somewhere, but buried a bit deep & are slow to load, I think.--[[User:Liz Henry\|Liz Henry]] 17:03, 12 June 2006 (PDT)

Lquilter: quick response

2006-06-12T17:18:27Z

quick response

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:18, 12 June 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is this intended to be a complete list of program items? If not, what's the organizing principle/basis for selection? [[User:Vicki\|Vicki]] 09:34, 12 June 2006 (PDT)		Is this intended to be a complete list of program items? If not, what's the organizing principle/basis for selection? [[User:Vicki\|Vicki]] 09:34, 12 June 2006 (PDT)

			:I started it as a place to link to con reports, ensuing discussion, or include notes on the wiki. Then I've just been adding some others as they come along, intending to perhaps inspire more posting of notes or discussions. I haven't gone thru & added in everything yet, but if someone wanted to do that, it would be nifty. [[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 10:18, 12 June 2006 (PDT)

Vicki: are we trying for completeness?

2006-06-12T16:34:05Z

are we trying for completeness?

New page

Is this intended to be a complete list of program items? If not, what's the organizing principle/basis for selection? [[User:Vicki|Vicki]] 09:34, 12 June 2006 (PDT)