Talk:Women eligible for 2008 SF Awards - Revision history

Lquilter: Reverted edits by 89.107.104.120 (Talk) to last revision by 206.248.146.175

2010-02-28T17:39:40Z

Reverted edits by 89.107.104.120 (Talk) to last revision by 206.248.146.175

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:39, 28 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~aklgEq <a href~~=~~"http://lwjbvweqyrjf.com/">lwjbvweqyrjf</a>~~, ~~[url=http://gkumoddnwwjr~~.~~com/]gkumoddnwwjr[/url], [link=http://znyrgwbakrjx~~.~~com/]znyrgwbakrjx[/link], http://hlmnzvmnmeny~~.~~com/~~		==Best Graphic Story==
			Any chance of getting women who create graphic stories (ie comic books, manga, etc...) listed?

	==praise==		==praise==

89.107.104.120: /* Best Graphic Story */

2010-02-28T15:11:54Z

Best Graphic Story

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:11, 28 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==~~Best Graphic Story~~==		aklgEq <a href="http://lwjbvweqyrjf.com/">lwjbvweqyrjf</a>, [url=http://gkumoddnwwjr.com/]gkumoddnwwjr[/url], [link=http://znyrgwbakrjx.com/]znyrgwbakrjx[/link], http://hlmnzvmnmeny.com/
	~~Any chance of getting women who create graphic stories (ie comic books, manga~~, ~~etc..~~.~~) listed?~~

	==praise==		==praise==

206.248.146.175 at 20:54, 12 January 2009

2009-01-12T20:54:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:54, 12 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Best Graphic Story==
			Any chance of getting women who create graphic stories (ie comic books, manga, etc...) listed?

	==praise==		==praise==
	Oh, wow!! Fabulous work, y'all!--[[User:Liz Henry\|Liz Henry]] 19:28, 18 April 2007 (PDT)		Oh, wow!! Fabulous work, y'all!--[[User:Liz Henry\|Liz Henry]] 19:28, 18 April 2007 (PDT)

Liz Henry: /* Questions */ Nebulas??

2007-12-27T17:05:58Z

Questions: Nebulas??

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:05, 27 December 2007
Line 30:		Line 30:
	: Angry Black Woman is starting a FemSFBookSwap on [http://librarything.com/ LibraryThing], and we're thinking about doing a blog or a FSFwiki forum or something for it, too. ... Actually we have a [http://forums.feministsf.net/ FSF forum], already (at http://forums.feministsf.net/ ), which we set up but haven't done a lot with. It would be easy to set up a thread for book swap & spin & recommendations. ... I agree that the wiki software isn't really conducive to this, because there's no threading, etc. It would be nice to have it tightly interwoven, but maybe we can figure out a way to make it easy to link to the FSFwiki. ... LibraryThing is a commercial project but it's awesome and very* SF friendly. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 23:23, 10 May 2007 (PDT)		: Angry Black Woman is starting a FemSFBookSwap on [http://librarything.com/ LibraryThing], and we're thinking about doing a blog or a FSFwiki forum or something for it, too. ... Actually we have a [http://forums.feministsf.net/ FSF forum], already (at http://forums.feministsf.net/ ), which we set up but haven't done a lot with. It would be easy to set up a thread for book swap & spin & recommendations. ... I agree that the wiki software isn't really conducive to this, because there's no threading, etc. It would be nice to have it tightly interwoven, but maybe we can figure out a way to make it easy to link to the FSFwiki. ... LibraryThing is a commercial project but it's awesome and very* SF friendly. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 23:23, 10 May 2007 (PDT)
	*:: I think LibraryThing would be good for helping to track and pass books, but a more typical forum would be better for advocating books, mainly due to more familiarity in the general public with the workings of typical forums, and due to the ability to link to individual posts. Each book discussed can have its own thread, which will be persistent (unlike a blog where things scroll off and get lost, and new comments aren't obvious), with links back and forth to the book page on the wiki, and the LibraryThing page. I think the FSF forum would be ideal for this... I'd probably set it up as "Published 2007" (or "Advocacy 2007"?) then "Books" "Shorter written works" and "Other"... But that's just a first thought. Should this maybe be a discussion on the FSF blog? --[[User:Madeline F\|Madeline F]] 16:37, 11 May 2007 (PDT)		*:: I think LibraryThing would be good for helping to track and pass books, but a more typical forum would be better for advocating books, mainly due to more familiarity in the general public with the workings of typical forums, and due to the ability to link to individual posts. Each book discussed can have its own thread, which will be persistent (unlike a blog where things scroll off and get lost, and new comments aren't obvious), with links back and forth to the book page on the wiki, and the LibraryThing page. I think the FSF forum would be ideal for this... I'd probably set it up as "Published 2007" (or "Advocacy 2007"?) then "Books" "Shorter written works" and "Other"... But that's just a first thought. Should this maybe be a discussion on the FSF blog? --[[User:Madeline F\|Madeline F]] 16:37, 11 May 2007 (PDT)

			What about the Nebula awards? I'm a bit confused why we don't list them and I might just go ahead and add them to this page.
			- LH

	==redirect==		==redirect==

Madeline F at 23:37, 11 May 2007

2007-05-11T23:37:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:37, 11 May 2007
Line 29:		Line 29:
	* Where should we coordinate our actions? We need someplace to say "Oh, I've read this, it's awesome" "I'm going to hunt down [blah person with a big blog] at [blah convention] and give them a copy..." I was making a stab that direction with the Gottleib thing, but I'm not sure this page is the best place for burbling spin etc. Is there an appropriate forum somewhere we can add a section to? --[[User:Madeline F\|Madeline F]] 19:26, 10 May 2007 (PDT)		* Where should we coordinate our actions? We need someplace to say "Oh, I've read this, it's awesome" "I'm going to hunt down [blah person with a big blog] at [blah convention] and give them a copy..." I was making a stab that direction with the Gottleib thing, but I'm not sure this page is the best place for burbling spin etc. Is there an appropriate forum somewhere we can add a section to? --[[User:Madeline F\|Madeline F]] 19:26, 10 May 2007 (PDT)
	: Angry Black Woman is starting a FemSFBookSwap on [http://librarything.com/ LibraryThing], and we're thinking about doing a blog or a FSFwiki forum or something for it, too. ... Actually we have a [http://forums.feministsf.net/ FSF forum], already (at http://forums.feministsf.net/ ), which we set up but haven't done a lot with. It would be easy to set up a thread for book swap & spin & recommendations. ... I agree that the wiki software isn't really conducive to this, because there's no threading, etc. It would be nice to have it tightly interwoven, but maybe we can figure out a way to make it easy to link to the FSFwiki. ... LibraryThing is a commercial project but it's awesome and very* SF friendly. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 23:23, 10 May 2007 (PDT)		: Angry Black Woman is starting a FemSFBookSwap on [http://librarything.com/ LibraryThing], and we're thinking about doing a blog or a FSFwiki forum or something for it, too. ... Actually we have a [http://forums.feministsf.net/ FSF forum], already (at http://forums.feministsf.net/ ), which we set up but haven't done a lot with. It would be easy to set up a thread for book swap & spin & recommendations. ... I agree that the wiki software isn't really conducive to this, because there's no threading, etc. It would be nice to have it tightly interwoven, but maybe we can figure out a way to make it easy to link to the FSFwiki. ... LibraryThing is a commercial project but it's awesome and very* SF friendly. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 23:23, 10 May 2007 (PDT)
			*:: I think LibraryThing would be good for helping to track and pass books, but a more typical forum would be better for advocating books, mainly due to more familiarity in the general public with the workings of typical forums, and due to the ability to link to individual posts. Each book discussed can have its own thread, which will be persistent (unlike a blog where things scroll off and get lost, and new comments aren't obvious), with links back and forth to the book page on the wiki, and the LibraryThing page. I think the FSF forum would be ideal for this... I'd probably set it up as "Published 2007" (or "Advocacy 2007"?) then "Books" "Shorter written works" and "Other"... But that's just a first thought. Should this maybe be a discussion on the FSF blog? --[[User:Madeline F\|Madeline F]] 16:37, 11 May 2007 (PDT)

	==redirect==		==redirect==

Lquilter: /* Questions */ hmm, ideas

2007-05-11T06:23:28Z

Questions: hmm, ideas

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:23, 10 May 2007
Line 28:		Line 28:

	* Where should we coordinate our actions? We need someplace to say "Oh, I've read this, it's awesome" "I'm going to hunt down [blah person with a big blog] at [blah convention] and give them a copy..." I was making a stab that direction with the Gottleib thing, but I'm not sure this page is the best place for burbling spin etc. Is there an appropriate forum somewhere we can add a section to? --[[User:Madeline F\|Madeline F]] 19:26, 10 May 2007 (PDT)		* Where should we coordinate our actions? We need someplace to say "Oh, I've read this, it's awesome" "I'm going to hunt down [blah person with a big blog] at [blah convention] and give them a copy..." I was making a stab that direction with the Gottleib thing, but I'm not sure this page is the best place for burbling spin etc. Is there an appropriate forum somewhere we can add a section to? --[[User:Madeline F\|Madeline F]] 19:26, 10 May 2007 (PDT)
			: Angry Black Woman is starting a FemSFBookSwap on [http://librarything.com/ LibraryThing], and we're thinking about doing a blog or a FSFwiki forum or something for it, too. ... Actually we have a [http://forums.feministsf.net/ FSF forum], already (at http://forums.feministsf.net/ ), which we set up but haven't done a lot with. It would be easy to set up a thread for book swap & spin & recommendations. ... I agree that the wiki software isn't really conducive to this, because there's no threading, etc. It would be nice to have it tightly interwoven, but maybe we can figure out a way to make it easy to link to the FSFwiki. ... LibraryThing is a commercial project but it's awesome and very* SF friendly. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 23:23, 10 May 2007 (PDT)

	==redirect==		==redirect==

Madeline F: /* page split? */

2007-05-11T02:31:11Z

page split?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:31, 10 May 2007
Line 61:		Line 61:

	: It is a complete mystery to me as well, but occasionally you can find things out. The way to get a signature is to put four of these little wiggly things ~ in a row. So I guess in the wiki universe it takes four sperms to make a person. [[User:Cheryl\|Cheryl]] 19:09, 3 May 2007 (PDT)		: It is a complete mystery to me as well, but occasionally you can find things out. The way to get a signature is to put four of these little wiggly things ~ in a row. So I guess in the wiki universe it takes four sperms to make a person. [[User:Cheryl\|Cheryl]] 19:09, 3 May 2007 (PDT)

			:: Thanks so much to you and LQ who sent a private message! And for the sperm thing, oy, now that syntax is indelibly stuck in my head. ;) --[[User:Madeline F\|Madeline F]] 19:31, 10 May 2007 (PDT)

	I have copied two of the sections to their own pages: [[Eligibility and voting by award]] and [[Award activism]]. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 00:23, 30 April 2007 (PDT)		I have copied two of the sections to their own pages: [[Eligibility and voting by award]] and [[Award activism]]. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 00:23, 30 April 2007 (PDT)

	: most but not all (liz?) are on board with splitting; ide cyan copied the content so i'm going to delete from the original page lest we start getting two different versions. if consensus moves the other way we can remerge. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 04:15, 30 April 2007 (PDT)		: most but not all (liz?) are on board with splitting; ide cyan copied the content so i'm going to delete from the original page lest we start getting two different versions. if consensus moves the other way we can remerge. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 04:15, 30 April 2007 (PDT)

Madeline F: /* Questions */

2007-05-11T02:26:38Z

Questions

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 10 May 2007
Line 26:		Line 26:

	*: linking author pseudonyms - I think it's a good idea to do it to facilitate finding information. Are you making a suggestion to do that, or raising a concern about authors who are closeted with their pseudonyms? If the latter, then I think we should try to be respectful of closeted identities and not include that information. However, many (most?) pseudonyms are public information and not really an attempt to hide or create privacy. Other thoughts? --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 10:28, 29 April 2007 (PDT)		*: linking author pseudonyms - I think it's a good idea to do it to facilitate finding information. Are you making a suggestion to do that, or raising a concern about authors who are closeted with their pseudonyms? If the latter, then I think we should try to be respectful of closeted identities and not include that information. However, many (most?) pseudonyms are public information and not really an attempt to hide or create privacy. Other thoughts? --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 10:28, 29 April 2007 (PDT)

			* Where should we coordinate our actions? We need someplace to say "Oh, I've read this, it's awesome" "I'm going to hunt down [blah person with a big blog] at [blah convention] and give them a copy..." I was making a stab that direction with the Gottleib thing, but I'm not sure this page is the best place for burbling spin etc. Is there an appropriate forum somewhere we can add a section to? --[[User:Madeline F\|Madeline F]] 19:26, 10 May 2007 (PDT)

	==redirect==		==redirect==

Cheryl: /* page split? */

2007-05-04T02:09:02Z

page split?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, 3 May 2007
Line 57:		Line 57:

	: Sorry I have no idea how to sign this. Wiki syntax is completely baffling and makes me want to cry and I'm too daunted to hunt down more wiki syntax info on wikipedia this evening. --Madeline F		: Sorry I have no idea how to sign this. Wiki syntax is completely baffling and makes me want to cry and I'm too daunted to hunt down more wiki syntax info on wikipedia this evening. --Madeline F

			: It is a complete mystery to me as well, but occasionally you can find things out. The way to get a signature is to put four of these little wiggly things ~ in a row. So I guess in the wiki universe it takes four sperms to make a person. [[User:Cheryl\|Cheryl]] 19:09, 3 May 2007 (PDT)

	I have copied two of the sections to their own pages: [[Eligibility and voting by award]] and [[Award activism]]. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 00:23, 30 April 2007 (PDT)		I have copied two of the sections to their own pages: [[Eligibility and voting by award]] and [[Award activism]]. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 00:23, 30 April 2007 (PDT)

	: most but not all (liz?) are on board with splitting; ide cyan copied the content so i'm going to delete from the original page lest we start getting two different versions. if consensus moves the other way we can remerge. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 04:15, 30 April 2007 (PDT)		: most but not all (liz?) are on board with splitting; ide cyan copied the content so i'm going to delete from the original page lest we start getting two different versions. if consensus moves the other way we can remerge. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 04:15, 30 April 2007 (PDT)

Lquilter: /* page split? */ ok

2007-04-30T11:15:03Z

page split?: ok

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:15, 30 April 2007
Line 59:		Line 59:

	I have copied two of the sections to their own pages: [[Eligibility and voting by award]] and [[Award activism]]. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 00:23, 30 April 2007 (PDT)		I have copied two of the sections to their own pages: [[Eligibility and voting by award]] and [[Award activism]]. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 00:23, 30 April 2007 (PDT)

			: most but not all (liz?) are on board with splitting; ide cyan copied the content so i'm going to delete from the original page lest we start getting two different versions. if consensus moves the other way we can remerge. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 04:15, 30 April 2007 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:31, 10 May 2007
Line 61:		Line 61:

	: It is a complete mystery to me as well, but occasionally you can find things out. The way to get a signature is to put four of these little wiggly things ~ in a row. So I guess in the wiki universe it takes four sperms to make a person. [[User:Cheryl\|Cheryl]] 19:09, 3 May 2007 (PDT)		: It is a complete mystery to me as well, but occasionally you can find things out. The way to get a signature is to put four of these little wiggly things ~ in a row. So I guess in the wiki universe it takes four sperms to make a person. [[User:Cheryl\|Cheryl]] 19:09, 3 May 2007 (PDT)

			:: Thanks so much to you and LQ who sent a private message! And for the sperm thing, oy, now that syntax is indelibly stuck in my head. ;) --[[User:Madeline F\|Madeline F]] 19:31, 10 May 2007 (PDT)

	I have copied two of the sections to their own pages: [[Eligibility and voting by award]] and [[Award activism]]. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 00:23, 30 April 2007 (PDT)		I have copied two of the sections to their own pages: [[Eligibility and voting by award]] and [[Award activism]]. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 00:23, 30 April 2007 (PDT)

	: most but not all (liz?) are on board with splitting; ide cyan copied the content so i'm going to delete from the original page lest we start getting two different versions. if consensus moves the other way we can remerge. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 04:15, 30 April 2007 (PDT)		: most but not all (liz?) are on board with splitting; ide cyan copied the content so i'm going to delete from the original page lest we start getting two different versions. if consensus moves the other way we can remerge. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 04:15, 30 April 2007 (PDT)