User talk:Ide Cyan - Revision history

Ide Cyan: /* randomness */

2008-02-27T00:42:25Z

randomness

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 26 February 2008
Line 57:		Line 57:
	==randomness==		==randomness==
	hi ide cyan -- i am all on fire for the wiki again, inspired partly by tvtropes and frustration with wikipedia. i'd like to set up some kind of project or goal or topic or working project ("clear the redlinks") or something like that for march; got any ideas? --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 11:39, 14 February 2008 (PST)		hi ide cyan -- i am all on fire for the wiki again, inspired partly by tvtropes and frustration with wikipedia. i'd like to set up some kind of project or goal or topic or working project ("clear the redlinks") or something like that for march; got any ideas? --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 11:39, 14 February 2008 (PST)

			: Not really -- I tend to update when something occurs to me. I don't have any specific projects in mind. If you'd like to talk, you can reach me on Google Chat. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 16:42, 26 February 2008 (PST)

Lquilter: randomness

2008-02-14T19:39:50Z

randomness

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:39, 14 February 2008
Line 54:		Line 54:

	I'm glad I can help! --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 18:05, 8 June 2007 (PDT)		I'm glad I can help! --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 18:05, 8 June 2007 (PDT)

			==randomness==
			hi ide cyan -- i am all on fire for the wiki again, inspired partly by tvtropes and frustration with wikipedia. i'd like to set up some kind of project or goal or topic or working project ("clear the redlinks") or something like that for march; got any ideas? --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 11:39, 14 February 2008 (PST)

Ide Cyan: /* tx */ yw

2007-06-09T01:05:00Z

tx: yw

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:05, 8 June 2007
Line 52:		Line 52:

	tx ide - it makes it MUCH easier for me to quickly deal with the vandals. i had been thinking it was a malfunctioning spambot, but that doesn't explain the Abc0ef type logins which have now done the same behavior twice. anyway -- i've been really swamped this week so THANK you for doing this b/c otherwise i wouldn't have had time to deal with it. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 09:17, 8 June 2007 (PDT)		tx ide - it makes it MUCH easier for me to quickly deal with the vandals. i had been thinking it was a malfunctioning spambot, but that doesn't explain the Abc0ef type logins which have now done the same behavior twice. anyway -- i've been really swamped this week so THANK you for doing this b/c otherwise i wouldn't have had time to deal with it. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 09:17, 8 June 2007 (PDT)

			I'm glad I can help! --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 18:05, 8 June 2007 (PDT)

Lquilter: tx

2007-06-08T16:17:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, 8 June 2007
Line 48:		Line 48:

	yes i am tired. i am so tired i made that typo. then i saw it and thought i should fix it. then i forgot about it again before i fixed it. tx & good night. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 23:17, 1 June 2007 (PDT)		yes i am tired. i am so tired i made that typo. then i saw it and thought i should fix it. then i forgot about it again before i fixed it. tx & good night. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 23:17, 1 June 2007 (PDT)

			== tx ==

			tx ide - it makes it MUCH easier for me to quickly deal with the vandals. i had been thinking it was a malfunctioning spambot, but that doesn't explain the Abc0ef type logins which have now done the same behavior twice. anyway -- i've been really swamped this week so THANK you for doing this b/c otherwise i wouldn't have had time to deal with it. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 09:17, 8 June 2007 (PDT)

Lquilter: girl-woner

2007-06-02T06:17:44Z

girl-woner

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:17, 1 June 2007
Line 44:		Line 44:

	* More on categorization, because people are creating new categories all the time and I think it would be helpful to get folks who have been working on the wiki for a while and have a sense of what categories are useful for, or not, to think about this. if you haven't been thinking about categories structurally you've probably got a lot of experience to bring to bear on the issue, and if you have been, then your insights would be welcome. See [[:FSFwiki talk:Categorization]]. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 11:44, 25 April 2007 (PDT)		* More on categorization, because people are creating new categories all the time and I think it would be helpful to get folks who have been working on the wiki for a while and have a sense of what categories are useful for, or not, to think about this. if you haven't been thinking about categories structurally you've probably got a lot of experience to bring to bear on the issue, and if you have been, then your insights would be welcome. See [[:FSFwiki talk:Categorization]]. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 11:44, 25 April 2007 (PDT)

			== girl-woner ==

			yes i am tired. i am so tired i made that typo. then i saw it and thought i should fix it. then i forgot about it again before i fixed it. tx & good night. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 23:17, 1 June 2007 (PDT)

Lquilter: /* categories */ notes

2007-04-25T18:44:26Z

categories: notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:44, 25 April 2007
Line 42:		Line 42:
	==categories==		==categories==
	Hey Ide Cyan - User:Contributor just created some new categories (Black British, British, etc.). I raised a question on FSFwiki_talk:Categorization/Defaults about what kinds of categories should we have. I was thinking about gender and what kind of work people write (specifically, SF versus non-SF), but it's broader than that, and certainly applies to ethnicity, nationality, and other categories as well. It would be great to have those of us who work on FSFwiki think through some of the categorization issues. ... From Wikipedia, I've learned to be very restrained about categories, and use lists instead of categories, to create visibility. But we should really get a sense of what are the key features that we need automatic categories for. This is not a suggestion that we should not include gender, nationality, ethnicity, etc., sexuality, etc., of people, but rather a question of whether it's better to do it through categories or lists. Categories are easier to add initially, but lists are easier to maintain over time. Your thoughts would be welcome. --LQ 17:26, 21 March 2007 (PDT)		Hey Ide Cyan - User:Contributor just created some new categories (Black British, British, etc.). I raised a question on FSFwiki_talk:Categorization/Defaults about what kinds of categories should we have. I was thinking about gender and what kind of work people write (specifically, SF versus non-SF), but it's broader than that, and certainly applies to ethnicity, nationality, and other categories as well. It would be great to have those of us who work on FSFwiki think through some of the categorization issues. ... From Wikipedia, I've learned to be very restrained about categories, and use lists instead of categories, to create visibility. But we should really get a sense of what are the key features that we need automatic categories for. This is not a suggestion that we should not include gender, nationality, ethnicity, etc., sexuality, etc., of people, but rather a question of whether it's better to do it through categories or lists. Categories are easier to add initially, but lists are easier to maintain over time. Your thoughts would be welcome. --LQ 17:26, 21 March 2007 (PDT)

			* More on categorization, because people are creating new categories all the time and I think it would be helpful to get folks who have been working on the wiki for a while and have a sense of what categories are useful for, or not, to think about this. if you haven't been thinking about categories structurally you've probably got a lot of experience to bring to bear on the issue, and if you have been, then your insights would be welcome. See [[:FSFwiki talk:Categorization]]. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 11:44, 25 April 2007 (PDT)

Lquilter: cmt ono categorization (and adding head to top cmt)

2007-03-22T00:28:05Z

cmt ono categorization (and adding head to top cmt)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:28, 21 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==materialist feminism==
	Hey Ide Cyan -- Would you care to write a paragraph or two about [[Materialist feminism]] ? I think it would be helpful, as we build out various analyses of works and trends within sf, to be able to refer to significant theories & approaches. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 10:14, 6 February 2007 (PST)		Hey Ide Cyan -- Would you care to write a paragraph or two about [[Materialist feminism]] ? I think it would be helpful, as we build out various analyses of works and trends within sf, to be able to refer to significant theories & approaches. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 10:14, 6 February 2007 (PST)

Line 38:		Line 39:
	==SF or sf==		==SF or sf==
	* Somehow, been using "SF" as the standard; it was a typeface convention from making image files and whatnot for feministSF, but I think it's okay. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 21:10, 16 February 2007 (PST)		* Somehow, been using "SF" as the standard; it was a typeface convention from making image files and whatnot for feministSF, but I think it's okay. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 21:10, 16 February 2007 (PST)

			==categories==
			Hey Ide Cyan - User:Contributor just created some new categories (Black British, British, etc.). I raised a question on FSFwiki_talk:Categorization/Defaults about what kinds of categories should we have. I was thinking about gender and what kind of work people write (specifically, SF versus non-SF), but it's broader than that, and certainly applies to ethnicity, nationality, and other categories as well. It would be great to have those of us who work on FSFwiki think through some of the categorization issues. ... From Wikipedia, I've learned to be very restrained about categories, and use lists instead of categories, to create visibility. But we should really get a sense of what are the key features that we need automatic categories for. This is not a suggestion that we should not include gender, nationality, ethnicity, etc., sexuality, etc., of people, but rather a question of whether it's better to do it through categories or lists. Categories are easier to add initially, but lists are easier to maintain over time. Your thoughts would be welcome. --LQ 17:26, 21 March 2007 (PDT)

Lquilter: /* moving pages & talk pages */ sleepy ramblings

2007-02-17T05:37:37Z

moving pages & talk pages: sleepy ramblings

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:37, 16 February 2007
Line 33:		Line 33:

	:If you go [http://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Special:Movepage/Women_attacking_their_lovers here] you can see the same sort of thing I saw when I first moved it. Compare with with [http://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Special:Movepage/Female_friendships this one], for instance. Do you see the extra warnings and checkbox? I can make screencaps to show you, if you can't. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 21:13, 16 February 2007 (PST)		:If you go [http://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Special:Movepage/Women_attacking_their_lovers here] you can see the same sort of thing I saw when I first moved it. Compare with with [http://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Special:Movepage/Female_friendships this one], for instance. Do you see the extra warnings and checkbox? I can make screencaps to show you, if you can't. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 21:13, 16 February 2007 (PST)

			:: I see the difference, thanks. The thing I notice here is that there is a talk page for women attacking, and there is no talk page for female friendships. So the lack of option-to-move-talk-page makes sense for Female Friendships. But there were some lower-case-moves you made that showed up in the recent-changes as two moves: one for the page and one for the talk. You shouldn't have to do them, if the check thing works. Or maybe it's just showing up twice in the change log and you're not? ... anyway I'm realizing that I'm practically incoherent with exhaustion, so apologies if i'm seeing problems that aren't there or not seeing what's obvious or not being clear or all of the above. i think i need to go to sleep now. (except i'm in ny tonight & my damn nyc roommate has his friends from france here & they're up late and i don't want to bug them because it's a rare thing to have friends from france & it's not their fault i'm 15 years older than them and getting somewhat curmudgeonly). ... maybe, if you are having any weird problems, just document them for me, and i'll try to figure out what's what in the a.m. when i'm more awake. but AFTER i do work-work. no more procrastination! --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 21:37, 16 February 2007 (PST)

	==SF or sf==		==SF or sf==
	* Somehow, been using "SF" as the standard; it was a typeface convention from making image files and whatnot for feministSF, but I think it's okay. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 21:10, 16 February 2007 (PST)		* Somehow, been using "SF" as the standard; it was a typeface convention from making image files and whatnot for feministSF, but I think it's okay. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 21:10, 16 February 2007 (PST)

Ide Cyan: /* moving pages & talk pages */ compare

2007-02-17T05:13:54Z

moving pages & talk pages: compare

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:13, 16 February 2007
Line 31:		Line 31:

	* Hey, the next time you see one of those where it doesn't want to move the talk page automatically, don't actually click the final "move"; drop me a line & let me know it. I want to look at it to see if there's some permission or reason you don't have that option. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 21:09, 16 February 2007 (PST)		* Hey, the next time you see one of those where it doesn't want to move the talk page automatically, don't actually click the final "move"; drop me a line & let me know it. I want to look at it to see if there's some permission or reason you don't have that option. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 21:09, 16 February 2007 (PST)

			:If you go [http://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Special:Movepage/Women_attacking_their_lovers here] you can see the same sort of thing I saw when I first moved it. Compare with with [http://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Special:Movepage/Female_friendships this one], for instance. Do you see the extra warnings and checkbox? I can make screencaps to show you, if you can't. --[[User:Ide Cyan\|Ide Cyan]] 21:13, 16 February 2007 (PST)

	==SF or sf==		==SF or sf==
	* Somehow, been using "SF" as the standard; it was a typeface convention from making image files and whatnot for feministSF, but I think it's okay. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 21:10, 16 February 2007 (PST)		* Somehow, been using "SF" as the standard; it was a typeface convention from making image files and whatnot for feministSF, but I think it's okay. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 21:10, 16 February 2007 (PST)

Lquilter: SF or sf

2007-02-17T05:10:28Z

SF or sf

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:10, 16 February 2007
Line 31:		Line 31:

	* Hey, the next time you see one of those where it doesn't want to move the talk page automatically, don't actually click the final "move"; drop me a line & let me know it. I want to look at it to see if there's some permission or reason you don't have that option. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 21:09, 16 February 2007 (PST)		* Hey, the next time you see one of those where it doesn't want to move the talk page automatically, don't actually click the final "move"; drop me a line & let me know it. I want to look at it to see if there's some permission or reason you don't have that option. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 21:09, 16 February 2007 (PST)

			==SF or sf==
			* Somehow, been using "SF" as the standard; it was a typeface convention from making image files and whatnot for feministSF, but I think it's okay. --[[User:Lquilter\|LQ]] 21:10, 16 February 2007 (PST)