Talk:Joss Whedon: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(must ... communicate ... humor/irony ... overtly.) |
m (Protected "Talk:Joss Whedon": spammed 2+x [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I am *not* trying to collect only the (relatively) few materials that critique Joss. This is horribly unbalanced right now! We need a lot more of the pro-Joss materials. LQ (with irony) | I am *not* trying to collect only the (relatively) few materials that critique Joss. This is horribly unbalanced right now! We need a lot more of the pro-Joss materials. LQ (with irony noted later) | ||
: Perish the thought! *eyeroll* Oh, this horrible idea that we might not render unto Joss, etc. smacks of obeisance anxiety. The man's feminism is not going to free any one of us if we live in deference to it. Sheesh! (Psst, you forgot to sign your comment.) --[[User:Ide Cyan|Ide Cyan]] 01:32, 14 July 2006 (PDT) | : Perish the thought! *eyeroll* Oh, this horrible idea that we might not render unto Joss, etc. smacks of obeisance anxiety. The man's feminism is not going to free any one of us if we live in deference to it. Sheesh! (Psst, you forgot to sign your comment.) --[[User:Ide Cyan|Ide Cyan]] 01:32, 14 July 2006 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:36, 1 June 2007
I am *not* trying to collect only the (relatively) few materials that critique Joss. This is horribly unbalanced right now! We need a lot more of the pro-Joss materials. LQ (with irony noted later)
- Perish the thought! *eyeroll* Oh, this horrible idea that we might not render unto Joss, etc. smacks of obeisance anxiety. The man's feminism is not going to free any one of us if we live in deference to it. Sheesh! (Psst, you forgot to sign your comment.) --Ide Cyan 01:32, 14 July 2006 (PDT)