Talk:Robert A. Heinlein: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I keep getting into frustrating conversations about Heinlein. I say something "Heinlein is very classic, but you have to set your sexism alarm to stun to read it" and they say "What sexism...) |
(agree) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Anyways I think it would be nice to have some kind of resource here to deal with this problem. Maybe this article would be that if it was longer, or maybe it should be it's own page. I don't know. ([[User:Glory|Glory]] 08:28, 8 June 2007 (PDT)) | Anyways I think it would be nice to have some kind of resource here to deal with this problem. Maybe this article would be that if it was longer, or maybe it should be it's own page. I don't know. ([[User:Glory|Glory]] 08:28, 8 June 2007 (PDT)) | ||
: totally agree -- i would start out just by putting material here. if it balloons (as it probably will) it can split off. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 09:19, 8 June 2007 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:19, 8 June 2007
I keep getting into frustrating conversations about Heinlein. I say something "Heinlein is very classic, but you have to set your sexism alarm to stun to read it" and they say "What sexism?". This is the point where I want to gibber. However gibbering in frustration isn't a good debate tactic. Also these people always use examples to works I have not read -and life is too short to read books that make my skin crawl with their sexism just to debate about them.
Anyways I think it would be nice to have some kind of resource here to deal with this problem. Maybe this article would be that if it was longer, or maybe it should be it's own page. I don't know. (Glory 08:28, 8 June 2007 (PDT))
- totally agree -- i would start out just by putting material here. if it balloons (as it probably will) it can split off. --LQ 09:19, 8 June 2007 (PDT)