Category talk:Notable Female Characters: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
We can be completist, we can list female characters in general, *and* still mark some female characters as notable, for whatever reason. Lead female character, for instance, or complex villains, may be far more notable than a male hero's girlfriend of the week, you know? And this doesn't preclude an examination of the "girlfriend of the week" syndrome, either. --[[User:Ide Cyan|Ide Cyan]] 14:12, 11 February 2007 (PST) | We can be completist, we can list female characters in general, *and* still mark some female characters as notable, for whatever reason. Lead female character, for instance, or complex villains, may be far more notable than a male hero's girlfriend of the week, you know? And this doesn't preclude an examination of the "girlfriend of the week" syndrome, either. --[[User:Ide Cyan|Ide Cyan]] 14:12, 11 February 2007 (PST) | ||
* but better just to flag as "notable", maybe? then anybody can be flagged as notable? ... no, that coudl be problematic. hmm. --LQ | |||
Latest revision as of 16:11, 11 February 2007
I wonder if the category should just be "Female characters" ... why wouldn't we be fairly completist, and talk about whatever aspects there are to any character? --LQ 18:22, 10 February 2007 (PST)
We can be completist, we can list female characters in general, *and* still mark some female characters as notable, for whatever reason. Lead female character, for instance, or complex villains, may be far more notable than a male hero's girlfriend of the week, you know? And this doesn't preclude an examination of the "girlfriend of the week" syndrome, either. --Ide Cyan 14:12, 11 February 2007 (PST)
- but better just to flag as "notable", maybe? then anybody can be flagged as notable? ... no, that coudl be problematic. hmm. --LQ