Dark Fantasy (WisCon 30 Panel): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(panelist notes) |
(links,cats) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Panel Description== | |||
18 Dark Fantasy | |||
Reading SF&F•629• Friday, 1:00-2:15 p.m. | |||
[[Dark fantasy]] has become wildly popular in both [[romance]] and [[erotica]]. What does it take for a fantasy to qualify as "dark?" It has to be more than just the use of beings such as [[vampire]]s and [[werewolf|werewolves]]. What is the appeal? Who are some of your favorite authors and why? | |||
==Panelists== | ==Panelists== | ||
[[ | M: [[Sarah Monette]], [[Patricia C. Hodgell]], [[Diana Sherman]], [[Tiffany L. Trent]] | ||
[[Patricia C. Hodgell]], [[Sarah Monette]] (moderator), [[Diana Sherman]], [[Tiffany L. Trent]]. [[Ron Serdiuk]] was scheduled to moderate but didn't make it. | |||
==External Links== | ==External Links== | ||
* [http://truepenny.livejournal.com/438909.html Sarah Monette's notes] | * [http://truepenny.livejournal.com/438909.html Sarah Monette's notes] | ||
* [http://coffeeandink.livejournal.com/604961.html Coffee and Ink notes] | |||
[[category:WisCon 30 | [[category:WisCon 30 panels]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:14, 30 July 2007
Panel Description
18 Dark Fantasy Reading SF&F•629• Friday, 1:00-2:15 p.m.
Dark fantasy has become wildly popular in both romance and erotica. What does it take for a fantasy to qualify as "dark?" It has to be more than just the use of beings such as vampires and werewolves. What is the appeal? Who are some of your favorite authors and why?
Panelists
M: Sarah Monette, Patricia C. Hodgell, Diana Sherman, Tiffany L. Trent
Patricia C. Hodgell, Sarah Monette (moderator), Diana Sherman, Tiffany L. Trent. Ron Serdiuk was scheduled to moderate but didn't make it.