Non-sexist: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
(cats) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Non-sexist''' is distinguished from [[feminism|feminist]] (or [[anti-sexist]]). Non-sexist is the state of not being affirmatively, apparently, obviously [[sexist]]. Non-sexist writing occupies a Boolean overlapping circle relationship with feminist / anti-sexist writing, in which much feminist/anti-sexist writing is non-sexist, and some non-sexist writing is feminist/anti-sexist, but there is also some feminist/anti-sexist writing which is simultaneously sexist, and there is also some non-sexist writing which is simultaneously not feminist/anti-sexist. I hope that's clear. | '''Non-sexist''' is distinguished from [[feminism|feminist]] (or [[anti-sexist]]). Non-sexist is the state of not being affirmatively, apparently, obviously [[sexist]]. Non-sexist writing occupies a Boolean overlapping circle relationship with feminist / anti-sexist writing, in which much feminist/anti-sexist writing is non-sexist, and some non-sexist writing is feminist/anti-sexist, but there is also some feminist/anti-sexist writing which is simultaneously sexist, and there is also some non-sexist writing which is simultaneously not feminist/anti-sexist. I hope that's clear. | ||
[[Category:Feminism and critical theory]] | |||
[[Category:Feminism]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:25, 11 November 2010
Non-sexist is distinguished from feminist (or anti-sexist). Non-sexist is the state of not being affirmatively, apparently, obviously sexist. Non-sexist writing occupies a Boolean overlapping circle relationship with feminist / anti-sexist writing, in which much feminist/anti-sexist writing is non-sexist, and some non-sexist writing is feminist/anti-sexist, but there is also some feminist/anti-sexist writing which is simultaneously sexist, and there is also some non-sexist writing which is simultaneously not feminist/anti-sexist. I hope that's clear.