Talk:Vagina dentata: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(new => fictional) |
(sig) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I haven't read ''Snow Crash'', but surely [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina_dentata vagina dentata] aren't anywhere ''near'' being '''new''' inventions, much less new ''technologies''. They've been part of mythical, misogynist biologies for centuries. --[[User:Ide Cyan|Ide Cyan]] 16:18, 21 February 2007 (PST) | I haven't read ''Snow Crash'', but surely [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina_dentata vagina dentata] aren't anywhere ''near'' being '''new''' inventions, much less new ''technologies''. They've been part of mythical, misogynist biologies for centuries. --[[User:Ide Cyan|Ide Cyan]] 16:18, 21 February 2007 (PST) | ||
: i don't think i said it was new, did i? i meant to say "fictional". it's a theme from the past, and showed up as a technology in snow crash, and then a couple of years ago a woman in south africa invented one. --[[User: | : i don't think i said it was new, did i? i meant to say "fictional". it's a theme from the past, and showed up as a technology in snow crash, and then a couple of years ago a woman in south africa invented one. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 20:25, 21 February 2007 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 20:25, 21 February 2007
I haven't read Snow Crash, but surely vagina dentata aren't anywhere near being new inventions, much less new technologies. They've been part of mythical, misogynist biologies for centuries. --Ide Cyan 16:18, 21 February 2007 (PST)
- i don't think i said it was new, did i? i meant to say "fictional". it's a theme from the past, and showed up as a technology in snow crash, and then a couple of years ago a woman in south africa invented one. --LQ 20:25, 21 February 2007 (PST)