Talk:French feminism theory: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Response) |
(resp) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: I've just read Delphy's essay. The point cannot be made strongly enough that so-called "French Feminism" is a complete fabrication. --[[User:Ide Cyan|Ide Cyan]] 18:17, 10 March 2007 (PST) | : I've just read Delphy's essay. The point cannot be made strongly enough that so-called "French Feminism" is a complete fabrication. --[[User:Ide Cyan|Ide Cyan]] 18:17, 10 March 2007 (PST) | ||
* Seriously, though, I never understood the phrase "french feminism" to be intended to refer to feminist thought broadly or the women's movement in France, but rather a particular strand of continental philosophy that was self-defined as feminist. I think there are clear connections between Cixous, Wittig, etc. You don't? | |||
I haven't read Delphy's essay - which one? | |||
I do think it's very important to point out that the so-called French feminist school of thought has been critiqued by some feminists as anti-feminist ... --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 18:19, 10 March 2007 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 19:19, 10 March 2007
What, you don't think "refers" was adequately glib? --LQ 18:14, 10 March 2007 (PST)
- I've just read Delphy's essay. The point cannot be made strongly enough that so-called "French Feminism" is a complete fabrication. --Ide Cyan 18:17, 10 March 2007 (PST)
- Seriously, though, I never understood the phrase "french feminism" to be intended to refer to feminist thought broadly or the women's movement in France, but rather a particular strand of continental philosophy that was self-defined as feminist. I think there are clear connections between Cixous, Wittig, etc. You don't?
I haven't read Delphy's essay - which one?
I do think it's very important to point out that the so-called French feminist school of thought has been critiqued by some feminists as anti-feminist ... --LQ 18:19, 10 March 2007 (PST)