Talk:Encyclopedia of female characters: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is a bit of an experiment. If it works, then I propose doing something similar for women writers. It would be a template that we would append to women writers that would automatically give them an infobox and link to a "Directory of women writer". So more clear that the category system is being used in different ways to create different sets of resources, and help avoid problems / issues of ghettoization or the question of what does ghettoization mean when we have an encyclopedia where the default is "woman". --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 13:08, 20 April 2007 (PDT) | This is a bit of an experiment. If it works, then I propose doing something similar for women writers. It would be a template that we would append to women writers that would automatically give them an infobox and link to a "Directory of women writer". So more clear that the category system is being used in different ways to create different sets of resources, and help avoid problems / issues of ghettoization or the question of what does ghettoization mean when we have an encyclopedia where the default is "woman". --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 13:08, 20 April 2007 (PDT) | ||
Does this mean we should get rid of the Notable female characters Category, and other similar things? --[[User:Glory|Glory]] 11:02, 26 April 2007 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:02, 26 April 2007
This is a bit of an experiment. If it works, then I propose doing something similar for women writers. It would be a template that we would append to women writers that would automatically give them an infobox and link to a "Directory of women writer". So more clear that the category system is being used in different ways to create different sets of resources, and help avoid problems / issues of ghettoization or the question of what does ghettoization mean when we have an encyclopedia where the default is "woman". --LQ 13:08, 20 April 2007 (PDT)
Does this mean we should get rid of the Notable female characters Category, and other similar things? --Glory 11:02, 26 April 2007 (PDT)