Talk:List of notable female characters: Difference between revisions
(definitions of Sf) |
(scully etc) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: i added all the "notability" kinds of criteria i could come up with. she didn't seem that notable to me. notability is whatever we make of it, of course, and you should add some criteria and/or criticize or discuss the criteria i posted. like maybe you don't like the "SF" criteria and think notability just means notability for one show or work for instance -- that was one i pondered for a while but i put it in because i eventually concluded that *was* sort of what i was thinking about when i thought "notable female character". do feel free to work on the definition too. or on the explanation of isabelle blundell, because "lesbian teenager" doesn't really mean notable *to me*. and even "lesbian teenager whose coming out was a plot point" pretty much describes 90% of coming out stories. but that's what means notable *to* *me*, so obviously you should also engage and talk about what feels notable *to you*. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 19:27, 29 April 2007 (PDT) | : i added all the "notability" kinds of criteria i could come up with. she didn't seem that notable to me. notability is whatever we make of it, of course, and you should add some criteria and/or criticize or discuss the criteria i posted. like maybe you don't like the "SF" criteria and think notability just means notability for one show or work for instance -- that was one i pondered for a while but i put it in because i eventually concluded that *was* sort of what i was thinking about when i thought "notable female character". do feel free to work on the definition too. or on the explanation of isabelle blundell, because "lesbian teenager" doesn't really mean notable *to me*. and even "lesbian teenager whose coming out was a plot point" pretty much describes 90% of coming out stories. but that's what means notable *to* *me*, so obviously you should also engage and talk about what feels notable *to you*. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 19:27, 29 April 2007 (PDT) | ||
... for instance, i took out scully because even though there's a big fandom, and she's a highly recognizable character, and i *love* the x-files and i *love* the character scully and i think there was real character development in her and real feminist points in her character development, and also some critiques ... even so, i ended up thinking, well, i just added her because *i* really loved her, and in the pantheon of female characters she wasn't that notable. she was an improved version of susan calvin but not that much improved and she was just sort of a well-known character in a long slow transformation of a particular type of character -- not so much notable in and of herself in terms of influence on other characters. or at least that was my assessment and how i was thinking about things. i mostly haven't applied the criteria to the farscape/doctor who characters because i'm not familiar enough with the works to really assess; i feel a little skeptical because i haven't seen a ton of feminist analysis or shifting of characterization or anything else based on, say, zhaan. but obviously it's not just *my* criteria or ideas and there's lots of stuff i don't know. so i just tried to lay out criteria for what i was thinking to that other people could tinker with the criteria and also make their own assessments based on the (tinkered-with) criteria. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 19:34, 29 April 2007 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 18:34, 29 April 2007
Alienated lasted for TWO seasons, hello! And why should the duration of a series disqualify a character?! --Ide Cyan 12:48, 29 April 2007 (PDT)
- i added all the "notability" kinds of criteria i could come up with. she didn't seem that notable to me. notability is whatever we make of it, of course, and you should add some criteria and/or criticize or discuss the criteria i posted. like maybe you don't like the "SF" criteria and think notability just means notability for one show or work for instance -- that was one i pondered for a while but i put it in because i eventually concluded that *was* sort of what i was thinking about when i thought "notable female character". do feel free to work on the definition too. or on the explanation of isabelle blundell, because "lesbian teenager" doesn't really mean notable *to me*. and even "lesbian teenager whose coming out was a plot point" pretty much describes 90% of coming out stories. but that's what means notable *to* *me*, so obviously you should also engage and talk about what feels notable *to you*. --LQ 19:27, 29 April 2007 (PDT)
... for instance, i took out scully because even though there's a big fandom, and she's a highly recognizable character, and i *love* the x-files and i *love* the character scully and i think there was real character development in her and real feminist points in her character development, and also some critiques ... even so, i ended up thinking, well, i just added her because *i* really loved her, and in the pantheon of female characters she wasn't that notable. she was an improved version of susan calvin but not that much improved and she was just sort of a well-known character in a long slow transformation of a particular type of character -- not so much notable in and of herself in terms of influence on other characters. or at least that was my assessment and how i was thinking about things. i mostly haven't applied the criteria to the farscape/doctor who characters because i'm not familiar enough with the works to really assess; i feel a little skeptical because i haven't seen a ton of feminist analysis or shifting of characterization or anything else based on, say, zhaan. but obviously it's not just *my* criteria or ideas and there's lots of stuff i don't know. so i just tried to lay out criteria for what i was thinking to that other people could tinker with the criteria and also make their own assessments based on the (tinkered-with) criteria. --LQ 19:34, 29 April 2007 (PDT)