Talk:Slash: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(slash approach etc) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: It would be awesome if someone could write about the slash approach to viewing & reading texts, as well as other slash community stuff. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 07:07, 7 May 2007 (PDT) | : It would be awesome if someone could write about the slash approach to viewing & reading texts, as well as other slash community stuff. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 07:07, 7 May 2007 (PDT) | ||
:: How many other slash fans edit here, though? Because there '''is''' no one "slash approach"... I know about the articles '''I've''' read, here and there: other slash fans would know different articles, no doubt. [[User:Yonmei|Yonmei]] 11:39, 8 May 2007 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:39, 8 May 2007
Hi Ide Cyan -- Would you explain what you mean by "It's not JUST fan fiction." in replacing the category "fandom"? --LQ 09:31, 6 May 2007 (PDT)
- Slash Is A Way Of Life. It's an attitude. It's an approach to viweing and reading texts. It's critical essays, conventions, artwork, communities, in-jokes and flamewars and broccoli and green sweaters, oh my! --Ide Cyan 10:55, 6 May 2007 (PDT)
- It's not JUST fanfiction, but it is primarily fanfiction. Without the fanfiction, slash fandom wouldn't exist: but slash fandom is more than just fanfiction. (Ide Cyan forgot to mention the music vids!) Yonmei 02:59, 7 May 2007 (PDT)
- It would be awesome if someone could write about the slash approach to viewing & reading texts, as well as other slash community stuff. --LQ 07:07, 7 May 2007 (PDT)
- How many other slash fans edit here, though? Because there is no one "slash approach"... I know about the articles I've read, here and there: other slash fans would know different articles, no doubt. Yonmei 11:39, 8 May 2007 (PDT)