The Gate to Women's Country: Difference between revisions

From Feminist SF Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(march 2002)
(fmt)
Line 6: Line 6:
'''The Gate to Women's Country''' is a 1988 novel by [[Sheri S. Tepper]].
'''The Gate to Women's Country''' is a 1988 novel by [[Sheri S. Tepper]].


==Discussion==
A powerful and controversial novel of a [[post-holocaust]] world. In "Women's Country" women and men live separately; women inside the cities, and men outside in military encampments.  Startling and powerful, this novel has drawn criticism for what some perceive as authorial [[biological determinism]], [[homophobia]], and suspicion of democracy.  It has drawn praise as a serious thought experiment, exploring the roots of [[violence]], oppression, and moral agency.
A powerful and controversial novel of a post-holocaust world. In "Women's Country" women and men live separately; women inside the cities, and men outside in military encampments.  Startling and powerful, this novel has drawn criticism for what some perceive as authorial biological determinism, homophobia, and suspicion of democracy.  It has drawn praise as a serious thought experiment, exploring the roots of violence, oppression, and moral agency.
 
 


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
* [http://bdg.feministsf.net/archives/bdg_gatetowomenscountry.txt Book discussion group] on FeministSF mailing list (March 2002)
* [http://bdg.feministsf.net/archives/bdg_gatetowomenscountry.txt Book discussion group] on FeministSF mailing list (March 2002)
==See also==
* [[women and violence]]
* [[discovery of the dystopian truth]]


{{DEFAULTSORT:Gate to Women's Country, The}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Gate to Women's Country, The}}

Revision as of 07:09, 22 April 2008

Cover
Cover
Cover


The Gate to Women's Country is a 1988 novel by Sheri S. Tepper.

A powerful and controversial novel of a post-holocaust world. In "Women's Country" women and men live separately; women inside the cities, and men outside in military encampments. Startling and powerful, this novel has drawn criticism for what some perceive as authorial biological determinism, homophobia, and suspicion of democracy. It has drawn praise as a serious thought experiment, exploring the roots of violence, oppression, and moral agency.


Further reading

See also