|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| This is a bit of an experiment. If it works, then I propose doing something similar for women writers. It would be a template that we would append to women writers that would automatically give them an infobox and link to a "Directory of women writer". So more clear that the category system is being used in different ways to create different sets of resources, and help avoid problems / issues of ghettoization or the question of what does ghettoization mean when we have an encyclopedia where the default is "woman". --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 13:08, 20 April 2007 (PDT)
| | tuZJSa <a href="http://onzjwdxtadem.com/">onzjwdxtadem</a>, [url=http://hycykgpxpzwu.com/]hycykgpxpzwu[/url], [link=http://hswaroxxsqca.com/]hswaroxxsqca[/link], http://wdvjaspiianq.com/ |
| | |
| Does this mean we should get rid of the Notable female characters Category, and other similar things? --[[User:Glory|Glory]] 11:02, 26 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| : I think we should get rid of Category:Notable female characters and make a [[List of notable female characters]] instead. That way the list can include the name and a short explanation of ''why'' they're notable. "First this", "Most famous example of this", "influential in establishing a new genre", etc. ... And then we can get rid of all the other "characters by gender" categories. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 05:40, 27 April 2007 (PDT) | |
Revision as of 08:03, 28 February 2010