Slipstream: Difference between revisions

From Feminist SF Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(sterling)
Line 21: Line 21:
* Jay Lake & Ruth Nestvold, "Is Slipstream Just a Fancy Word for Voice?" ''Strange Horizons'', v. 2, no. 3 (April 2005), available at http://www.irosf.com/zine/printable.qsml?artid=10142
* Jay Lake & Ruth Nestvold, "Is Slipstream Just a Fancy Word for Voice?" ''Strange Horizons'', v. 2, no. 3 (April 2005), available at http://www.irosf.com/zine/printable.qsml?artid=10142
* Bruce Sterling, "Slipstream", ''SF Eye'', #5 (July 1989), available at http://www.eff.org/Misc/Publications/Bruce_Sterling/Catscan_columns/catscan.05
* Bruce Sterling, "Slipstream", ''SF Eye'', #5 (July 1989), available at http://www.eff.org/Misc/Publications/Bruce_Sterling/Catscan_columns/catscan.05
 
* Bruce Sterling, "[http://www.lib.ru/STERLINGB/catscan05.txt Slipstream]"
 


[[category:Genres]]
[[category:Genres]]

Revision as of 09:23, 21 August 2007

Defined as

This genre is not "category" SF; it is not even "genre" SF. Instead, it is a contemporary
kind of writing which has set its face against consensus reality. It is fantastic, surreal
sometimes, speculative on occasion, but not rigorously so. It does not aim to provoke
a "sense of wonder" or to systematically extrapolate in the manner of classic science
fiction.
Instead, this is a kind of writing which simply makes you feel very strange...

by Bruce Sterling in "Slipstream", SF Eye, #5 (July 1989), available at http://www.eff.org/Misc/Publications/Bruce_Sterling/Catscan_columns/catscan.05


[T]hat's one definition of slipstream: fiction with fantastical elements that's published in a marketing category other than speculative fiction. -- Jed Hartman, "Where Does Genre Come From?", Strange Horizons (2001), available at http://www.strangehorizons.com/2001/20011203/editorial.shtml


Further Reading