User talk:Lquilter: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Cat. cap.: yes) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: Yep, that's the rule I think is best; and it's sort of a standard from wikipedia. ... I was just going to do them all slowly, but maybe I should look for a bot to install. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 18:41, 11 February 2007 (PST) | : Yep, that's the rule I think is best; and it's sort of a standard from wikipedia. ... I was just going to do them all slowly, but maybe I should look for a bot to install. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 18:41, 11 February 2007 (PST) | ||
:: So, no exceptions for categories beginning with years? --[[User:Ide Cyan|Ide Cyan]] 18:43, 11 February 2007 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 18:43, 11 February 2007
Cat. cap.
Are you going to change *all* the entries about publications to lower-case "p"s for publications? That's going to take a while unless you have a robot to do it for you. There must be close to a thousand of those already. I was more or less going with the logic that only the first word of a category should be capitalised, unless they're names of things, like Star Trek or Star Wars, or they begin by a number, like the Year + Publication format, in which case the first word after the number'd be capitalised. What do you think? --Ide Cyan 18:40, 11 February 2007 (PST)
- Yep, that's the rule I think is best; and it's sort of a standard from wikipedia. ... I was just going to do them all slowly, but maybe I should look for a bot to install. --LQ 18:41, 11 February 2007 (PST)
- So, no exceptions for categories beginning with years? --Ide Cyan 18:43, 11 February 2007 (PST)