Talk:Vagina dentata: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(sig) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: i don't think i said it was new, did i? i meant to say "fictional". it's a theme from the past, and showed up as a technology in snow crash, and then a couple of years ago a woman in south africa invented one. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 20:25, 21 February 2007 (PST) | : i don't think i said it was new, did i? i meant to say "fictional". it's a theme from the past, and showed up as a technology in snow crash, and then a couple of years ago a woman in south africa invented one. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 20:25, 21 February 2007 (PST) | ||
It's the one-line "as portrayed in (a book published in the 1990s)" description that made it sound as if it hadn't existed before. --[[User:Ide Cyan|Ide Cyan]] 20:27, 21 February 2007 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 20:27, 21 February 2007
I haven't read Snow Crash, but surely vagina dentata aren't anywhere near being new inventions, much less new technologies. They've been part of mythical, misogynist biologies for centuries. --Ide Cyan 16:18, 21 February 2007 (PST)
- i don't think i said it was new, did i? i meant to say "fictional". it's a theme from the past, and showed up as a technology in snow crash, and then a couple of years ago a woman in south africa invented one. --LQ 20:25, 21 February 2007 (PST)
It's the one-line "as portrayed in (a book published in the 1990s)" description that made it sound as if it hadn't existed before. --Ide Cyan 20:27, 21 February 2007 (PST)