User talk:91.121.12.134: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I think they're just vandals, LQ. Possibly automated bots testing the waters for spam. 216.93.253.130 and 91.121.12.134 and 77.124.8.196 *have* no other edits, so I highly doubt it's just a mistake by a new contributor, who'd probably have realised they did something wrong. --[[User:Ide Cyan|Ide Cyan]] 17:41, 4 June 2007 (PDT) | I think they're just vandals, LQ. Possibly automated bots testing the waters for spam. 216.93.253.130 and 91.121.12.134 and 77.124.8.196 *have* no other edits, so I highly doubt it's just a mistake by a new contributor, who'd probably have realised they did something wrong. --[[User:Ide Cyan|Ide Cyan]] 17:41, 4 June 2007 (PDT) | ||
: i think you're totally right - i was going to send a note to liz & janice & you to try to keep an eye on it b/c i bet they're testing response times for reversal. i'm doing a lot of training & in-person stuff this week so won't be able to focus on other things sometimes. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 18: | : i think you're totally right - i was going to send a note to liz & janice & you to try to keep an eye on it b/c i bet they're testing response times for reversal. i'm doing a lot of training & in-person stuff this week so won't be able to focus on other things sometimes. --[[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 18:04, 4 June 2007 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:04, 4 June 2007
hi -- are you meaning to blank pages? or is that happening accidentally? if you need help with editing try FSFwiki:getting started --LQ 14:30, 3 June 2007 (PDT)
I think they're just vandals, LQ. Possibly automated bots testing the waters for spam. 216.93.253.130 and 91.121.12.134 and 77.124.8.196 *have* no other edits, so I highly doubt it's just a mistake by a new contributor, who'd probably have realised they did something wrong. --Ide Cyan 17:41, 4 June 2007 (PDT)
- i think you're totally right - i was going to send a note to liz & janice & you to try to keep an eye on it b/c i bet they're testing response times for reversal. i'm doing a lot of training & in-person stuff this week so won't be able to focus on other things sometimes. --LQ 18:04, 4 June 2007 (PDT)