Talk:RaceFail 09: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Internal Links for Blog Post Titles: :Yes. Since it is important to know who is speaking, and for half the participants, we don't. --~~~~) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
- vito excalibur | - vito excalibur | ||
:Yes. Since it is important to know who is speaking, and for half the participants, we don't. --[[User:Pleasantville|Pleasantville]] 17:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | :Yes. Since it is important to know who is speaking, and for half the participants, we don't. --[[User:Pleasantville|Pleasantville]] 17:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:: Wasn't this one of the sub-issues raised and is it therefore really appropriate to be taking a position on it here? --Kate Nepveu | |||
Revision as of 09:15, 6 February 2009
Internal Links for Blog Post Titles
I thought it would be a good idea for each of the major blog posts (particularly those that have disappeared from the public Internet) to have its own page where we can call out highlights, important threads, and individual comments that sparked other discussions/posts, etc. That will keep the main timeline page pretty clear and straightforward. -KTempest
- It's a good idea, though copyright restrictions may apply. --Pleasantville aka Kathryn Cramer16:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm really not digging this distinction between the pseudonyms and the driver's license names. Is this necessary, and if so, why?
- vito excalibur
- Yes. Since it is important to know who is speaking, and for half the participants, we don't. --Pleasantville 17:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- Wasn't this one of the sub-issues raised and is it therefore really appropriate to be taking a position on it here? --Kate Nepveu