Strong female character: Difference between revisions

From Feminist SF Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Strong female characters moved to Strong female character: standardizing to singular)
(cat)
 
Line 6: Line 6:




[[Category:Feminism]]
[[category:Feminism]]
[[Category:Feminism and critical theory]]
 
[[Category:Characterization]]
[[Category:Characterization]]

Latest revision as of 11:08, 11 November 2010

Some people consider that "strong female characters" are sufficient to define a work — particularly SF or other genre work — as feminist. This is no doubt in response to a standard that focused work on male characters, with female characters poorly characterized or entirely absent.

Characterizing people on attributes other than gender stereotypes is a critical aspect of characterization and good writing. While failing to characterize gender stereotypes is sexist, moving beyond gender stereotypes is but the first step in non-sexist writing: other pitfalls include, for example, gendered plotting, or unnoted acceptance of sexism on both the part of characters and the authorial voice.

Avoiding all pitfalls of sexist writing may render a work non-sexist, but it does not necessarily render a work feminist or anti-sexist.