Talk:WisCon 30: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Timmi Duchamp | Timmi Duchamp | ||
You can click on "history" at the top of any page to see the edits, including who is credited for them. If someone didn't log in, all you will see as a credit/attribution is their IP address -- probably not a good idea to cite to that; "anonymous" would be preferred in those instances. You can see what the individual contributions were by clicking on the links to the left of each individual contribution. Ideally, a transcript would be put in by person X, and then filled in by persons Y, Z, A, and B, of whom Z and B were panelists. But that hasn't happened yet. So far, typically, a transcript is initially put in by person X, and then edited by zero to three other people for formatting, typos, links, commentary. [[User:Lquilter|LQ]] 20 June 2006 | |||
Revision as of 13:46, 20 June 2006
Is this intended to be a complete list of program items? If not, what's the organizing principle/basis for selection? Vicki 09:34, 12 June 2006 (PDT)
- I started it as a place to link to con reports, ensuing discussion, or include notes on the wiki. Then I've just been adding some others as they come along, intending to perhaps inspire more posting of notes or discussions. I haven't gone thru & added in everything yet, but if someone wanted to do that, it would be nifty. LQ 10:18, 12 June 2006 (PDT)
- I added some of the panels I went to, but not all of them - in no particular pattern. It ended up being whatever I wasn't too exhausted to document. It might be nice to put in all the panel descriptions and participants, which are up on the Wiscon site somewhere, but buried a bit deep & are slow to load, I think.--Liz Henry 17:03, 12 June 2006 (PDT)
I'm interested in publishing some of the WisCon 30 panel transcripts & descriptions in a volume of the Conversation Pieces dedicated to WisCon 30. To publish a particular transcript, I'd need the cooperation as well as the permission of its author. (& I will also, of course, want to give people quoted the opportunity to verify that they made the statements attributed to them.) I know that Liz Henry produced the think-tank transcript. But is there a record, invisible to the casual reader, of who produced other of these transcripts?
Timmi Duchamp
You can click on "history" at the top of any page to see the edits, including who is credited for them. If someone didn't log in, all you will see as a credit/attribution is their IP address -- probably not a good idea to cite to that; "anonymous" would be preferred in those instances. You can see what the individual contributions were by clicking on the links to the left of each individual contribution. Ideally, a transcript would be put in by person X, and then filled in by persons Y, Z, A, and B, of whom Z and B were panelists. But that hasn't happened yet. So far, typically, a transcript is initially put in by person X, and then edited by zero to three other people for formatting, typos, links, commentary. LQ 20 June 2006