Revision as of 06:10, 29 September 2006

Defined as

This genre is not "category" SF; it is not even "genre" SF. Instead, it is a contemporary

kind of writing which has set its face against consensus reality. It is fantastic, surreal

sometimes, speculative on occasion, but not rigorously so. It does not aim to provoke

a "sense of wonder" or to systematically extrapolate in the manner of classic science

fiction.

Instead, this is a kind of writing which simply makes you feel very strange...

Jay Lake & Ruth Nestvold, "Is Slipstream Just a Fancy Word for Voice?" Strange Horizons, v. 2, no. 3 (April 2005), available at http://www.irosf.com/zine/printable.qsml?artid=10142
Bruce Sterling, "Slipstream", SF Eye, #5 (July 1989), available at http://www.eff.org/Misc/Publications/Bruce_Sterling/Catscan_columns/catscan.05

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+Defined as
+: This genre is not "category" SF; it is not even "genre" SF. Instead, it is a contemporary
+: kind of writing which has set its face against consensus reality. It is fantastic, surreal
+: sometimes, speculative on occasion, but not rigorously so. It does not aim to provoke
+: a "sense of wonder" or to systematically extrapolate in the manner of classic science
+: fiction.
+:
+: Instead, this is a kind of writing which simply makes you feel very strange...
+by [[Bruce Sterling]] in "Slipstream", ''SF Eye'', #5 (July 1989), available at http://www.eff.org/Misc/Publications/Bruce_Sterling/Catscan_columns/catscan.05
+=Further Reading=
+* Jay Lake & Ruth Nestvold, "Is Slipstream Just a Fancy Word for Voice?" ''Strange Horizons'', v. 2, no. 3 (April 2005), available at http://www.irosf.com/zine/printable.qsml?artid=10142
+* Bruce Sterling, "Slipstream", ''SF Eye'', #5 (July 1989), available at http://www.eff.org/Misc/Publications/Bruce_Sterling/Catscan_columns/catscan.05
 [[category:Genres]]

Slipstream: Difference between revisions