Feminist SF Wiki:Citing sources: Difference between revisions

From Feminist SF Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Ideally, factual statements that are not immediately, obviously verifiable should be referenced.  
Ideally, factual statements that are not immediately, obviously verifiable should be referenced.  


Provisionally, personal research is okay, but it needs to be described and credited as such, by a recognizable and findable identity--either a real name or a well-established pseudonym with history, reputation, and a chain of connections to a real person who has met the person under the pseudonym. Research not yet published must be able to be supported, and intended for publication of some sort. Web publication is fine. If appropriate, research may be published at http://feministsf.net/ . Basically, to be citeable, research must be  
==Personal research must be referenced, attributed, reviewable, and critiquable==
# credited to an ascertainable individual;  
Provisionally, personal research is okay, but it needs to be described and credited as such, by a recognizable and findable identity--either a real name or a well-established pseudonym with history, reputation, and a chain of connections to a real person who has met the person under the pseudonym. Research not yet published must be able to be supported, and intended for publication of some sort. Web publication is fine. If appropriate, research may be published at http://feministsf.net/ . Basically, to be citeable, unpublished research must be  
# attributed to an ascertainable individual (''by'' that individual);  
# reviewable on demand; and  
# reviewable on demand; and  
# critiquable by any review.  
# critiquable by any review.  

Revision as of 09:22, 5 November 2006

Ideally, factual statements that are not immediately, obviously verifiable should be referenced.

Personal research must be referenced, attributed, reviewable, and critiquable

Provisionally, personal research is okay, but it needs to be described and credited as such, by a recognizable and findable identity--either a real name or a well-established pseudonym with history, reputation, and a chain of connections to a real person who has met the person under the pseudonym. Research not yet published must be able to be supported, and intended for publication of some sort. Web publication is fine. If appropriate, research may be published at http://feministsf.net/ . Basically, to be citeable, unpublished research must be

  1. attributed to an ascertainable individual (by that individual);
  2. reviewable on demand; and
  3. critiquable by any review.




External Links