Size and beauty standards: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(GOI) |
(notes) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Size and beauty standards''' are used to value people. They are often not seen as legitimate in all purposes, but they typically affect decision-making ''sub rosa'' even when not recognized or acknowledged. They are highly gendered and racialized. | '''Size and beauty standards''' are used to value people. They are often not seen as legitimate in all purposes, but they typically affect decision-making ''sub rosa'' even when not recognized or acknowledged. They are highly gendered and racialized. | ||
For instance, the preference for tall men as shown in US elections; | For instance, the preference for | ||
* height: tall men as shown in US elections; body norms in airplane seats, shelving, cars (the airbags which killed short people, disproportionately women) | |||
* sizeism, most Western cultures valuing thinness in 20th century (but implicates class, because fatness is now equated with working class in US and thinness with professionalism or upper class); body norms in airplane seats, cars, etc. "Personal responsibility" > laziness, lack of self-control. Highly racialized and genderized. | |||
* Skin - See racism obviously; European-descent skin color (tans or pallor, a class and gender distinction in part); | |||
* Hair - hair styles (straightening for African-American women particularly; afros popular during Black Power movement; straightening for Jewish women ("Jewfros"); etc.); | |||
* foot-binding; cosmetic surgeries of various sorts; other mutilations. Surgery, ear piercing, tattoos, etc. Recent anti-tattoo screed by -- was it Rowbotham? or Jeffreys? | |||
* Dress requirements & standards; religious enforcement; women's beauty as men's property throughout different cultures. | |||
* make-up: women in make-up (a preference which varies widely; for instance, being seen as immodest in some cultures; necessary to be ladylike in US Southern culture; etc.); | |||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
[[Category:Intersecting oppressions]] | [[Category:Intersecting oppressions]] | ||
Revision as of 08:13, 5 May 2007
| Guide to oppressions & intersections in SF |
|---|
| Basics:
Classism |
| Manifestations:
Institutionalized, systemic, structural |
| Responses: Activism: Antiracism, feminism, etc. |
| SFnal treatments: |
| See also: |
| About the GOI |
Size and beauty standards are used to value people. They are often not seen as legitimate in all purposes, but they typically affect decision-making sub rosa even when not recognized or acknowledged. They are highly gendered and racialized.
For instance, the preference for
- height: tall men as shown in US elections; body norms in airplane seats, shelving, cars (the airbags which killed short people, disproportionately women)
- sizeism, most Western cultures valuing thinness in 20th century (but implicates class, because fatness is now equated with working class in US and thinness with professionalism or upper class); body norms in airplane seats, cars, etc. "Personal responsibility" > laziness, lack of self-control. Highly racialized and genderized.
- Skin - See racism obviously; European-descent skin color (tans or pallor, a class and gender distinction in part);
- Hair - hair styles (straightening for African-American women particularly; afros popular during Black Power movement; straightening for Jewish women ("Jewfros"); etc.);
- foot-binding; cosmetic surgeries of various sorts; other mutilations. Surgery, ear piercing, tattoos, etc. Recent anti-tattoo screed by -- was it Rowbotham? or Jeffreys?
- Dress requirements & standards; religious enforcement; women's beauty as men's property throughout different cultures.
- make-up: women in make-up (a preference which varies widely; for instance, being seen as immodest in some cultures; necessary to be ladylike in US Southern culture; etc.);
- This article is a SEED, meaning it is tiny and needs lots of work. Help it grow.