Size and beauty standards

Guide to oppressions & intersections in SF
Basics: Classism Racism Nationalism, colonialism, xenophobia Religious intolerance Antisemitism Sexism Homophobia & heterosexism Size & beauty standards Disability & ableism Ageism
Manifestations: Institutionalized, systemic, structural Unconscious Conscious Internalized Power relations
Responses: Activism: Antiracism, feminism, etc. Consciousness-raising Redress & affirmative action Diversity & representation
SFnal treatments: Race and feminist SF Race-and-gender stereotypes in SF
See also: Women of color in SF Queer women in SF Women Make SF
About the GOI

Size and beauty standards are used to value people. They are often not seen as legitimate in all purposes, but they typically affect decision-making sub rosa even when not recognized or acknowledged. They are highly gendered and racialized.

For instance, the preference for tall men as shown in US elections; women in make-up (a preference which varies widely; for instance, being seen as immodest in some cultures; necessary to be ladylike in US Southern culture; etc.); sizeism, most Western cultures valuing thinness in 20th century (but implicates class, because fatness is now equated with working class in US and thinness with professionalism or upper class); European-descent skin color (tans or pallor, a class and gender distinction in part); hair styles (straightening for African-American women particularly; afros popular during Black Power movement; straightening for Jewish women ("Jewfros"); etc.); foot-binding; cosmetic surgeries of various sorts; other mutilations. Dress requirements & standards; religious enforcement; women's beauty as men's property throughout different cultures. Surgery, diets, tattoos, etc. Recent anti-tattoo screed by -- was it Rowbotham? or Jeffreys?

This article is a SEED, meaning it is tiny and needs lots of work. Help it grow.